On July 25, 2026, Kalon Mitchell will present the sermonette, titled, “How Much Fruit Are You Bearing?”, and Michael Link will give the sermon, titled, “Forging Ahead.”

The live services are available, over video and audio, at http://eternalgod.org/live-services/ (12:30 pm Pacific Time; 1:30 pm Mountain Time; 2:30 pm Central Time; 3:30 pm Eastern Time; 8:30 pm Greenwich Mean Time; 9:30 pm Central European Time). Just click on Connect to Live Stream.

The closer you are to God, the more immediately He can respond to any issue or trials you may be going through. Peter’s example of walking on water is evidence of this. We read in Matthew 14:28-31: “And Peter answered Him and said, ‘Lord, if it is You, command me to come to You on the water.’ So He said, ‘Come.’ And when Peter had come down out of the boat, he walked on the water to go to Jesus.  But when he saw that the wind was boisterous, he was afraid; and beginning to sink he cried out, saying, ‘Lord, save me!’  And immediately Jesus stretched out His hand and caught him, and said to him, ‘O you of little faith, why did you doubt?’”

Even though Peter began to sink, he was already so close to Christ that He reached out and saved him from drowning. 

It is important for us to remain close to God in order to get such a response when facing trials or imminent danger. Prayer is one tool given to us by God to achieve such a state. We read about Christ getting up early and going to a quiet place to pray. “Now in the morning, having risen a long while before daylight, He went out and departed to a solitary place; and there He prayed” (Mark 1:35).

He did this to remain close to his Father, the Most High God. We have other examples of God’s servants who prayed regularly to maintain close contact with God. Daniel 6:10 tells us: “Now when Daniel knew that the writing was signed [prohibiting to pray to God], he went home. And in his upper room, with his windows open toward Jerusalem, he knelt down on his knees three times that day, and prayed and gave thanks before his God, as was his custom since early days.”

Notice, this was his daily habit since early days. 

With all the distractions in this day and age, we must not neglect to follow the examples left to us in the Bible for our own good. 1 Thessalonians  5:17 encourages us to “pray without ceasing.” This is an admonishment to persist in prayer even when it is not answered immediately by God. 

Certain frustration may set in when prayers are not answered in what we may feel is an adequate time. In some cases, they may not be answered in the way we want them to, as shown in Paul’s request to be healed by what appears to be some eye issue.  What did Christ say to him? “Concerning this thing I pleaded with the Lord three times that it might depart from me. And He said to me, ‘My grace is sufficient for you, for My strength is made perfect in weakness.’ Therefore most gladly I will rather boast in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me” (2 Corinthians 12:8-9). 

So, the reality is we may not get the answer we expect now; and when it comes to healing, some of us may have to wait until the resurrection for God to fulfill His promise of healing. That doesn’t mean we should ask God for healing once and not ask again. Rather, we should be persistent as shown in the parable below.

Luke 18:1-6 reads:  “Then He spoke a parable to them, that men always ought to pray and not lose heart, saying: ‘There was in a certain city a judge who did not fear God nor regard man. Now there was a widow in that city; and she came to him, saying, “Get justice for me from my adversary.” And he would not for a while; but afterward he said within himself, “Though I do not fear God nor regard man, yet because this widow troubles me I will avenge her, lest by her continual coming she weary me.” Then the Lord said, ‘Hear what the unjust judge said.’””

Furthermore, when praying about someone, we should continue until God heals them or until He makes it clear that He will not do so in this life, as He did in the case of the Apostle Paul. 

Prayer is a powerful tool we have in order to maintain a close relationship with God; so let us ensure we are not letting down in this important area of our lives.

By Norbert Link

We begin by reporting on Britain’s new Prime Minister Andy Burnham who attacked right away Margaret Thatcher and received praise from Donald Trump; continue with our coverage on the horrible continuation and totally insane spreading of the Iran war; and speak on Trump’s primary address which constituted a wasted opportunity.

We address at length the downfall of one of Germany’s leading politicians, if not the most powerful politician, Jens Spahn, but it would be premature to conclude that his downfall is permanent. “Deadly wounds” can be healed. In fact, Spahn’s incredible pride and his past scandals mirror those of Donald Trump. 

Please view our new StandingWatch program, titled, “The Downfall of Germany’s Most Powerful Politician.”

Speaking of Trump, we report on his effort to destroy the World Cup, showing his blatant arrogance again, and conclude with FIFA’s hypocrisy and that of Trump’s buddy, FIFA’s President Gianni Infantino.

PM Andy Burnham Attacks Margaret Thatcher

Fox News wrote on July 18:

“Britain’s… Prime Minister Andy Burnham [who was sworn in on Monday]  used his first speech as Labour leader Friday to condemn the economic model established in the 1980s by Margaret Thatcher and promise greater public control of essential services… [He] said that Britain had taken ‘a series of wrong turns in the 1980s,’ when political power was centralized and economic power was transferred to private companies. … Burnham’s speech offered the clearest indication yet that the former Greater Manchester mayor intends to move the party… toward greater state ownership, expanded council and social housing, giving more power to regional government and increased state involvement in essential services…

“Although he did not explicitly advocate returning Britain to the 1970s or refer to the late Lady Thatcher by name, free-market critics portrayed his attack on her reforms as an effort to revive the state-dominated economic policies that preceded her government…. The ideological shift presents an immediate political gamble. Burnham must unite Labour’s competing factions, reassure financial markets and respond to Reform UK’s growing challenge — all while taking office without winning a national election.”

The Telegraph wrote on July 20:

“Burnham’s attack on Thatcher ignores the rot she inherited, and the transformation delivered. [The new] Labour leader’s premise is profoundly misleading, and a familiar Left-leaning narrative…”

Attacking Thatcher will not fly too well for many Brits.

Trump Praises Burnham!

The Sun wrote on July 19:

“DONALD Trump has branded the UK a ‘poverty-stricken disaster’as he praised Andy Burnham over reported plans to open new North Sea oil drilling… In a Truth Social post the US president said: ‘The People of Aberdeen, in Scotland, are dancing in the streets because the new Prime Minister, Andy Burnham, has stated that he will be opening up, all the way, the invaluable North Sea Oil!’

“Trump described drilling the North Sea as ‘one of the Greatest Sources of quality Oil on Earth’. The commander-in-chief also said the drilling would be an economic boost for Brits. He added: ‘Britain pays Norway Billions of Dollars a year to buy its Oil, which they get from a less valuable part of the North Sea. How ridiculous is that!’..

“Going ahead with drilling would also go against Labour’s 2024 manifesto, under Sir Keir Starmer, which pledged not to issue new licences but to honour existing ones.”

Church of England Debates Israel

The Jerusalem Post wrote on July 13:

“The Church of England’s General Synod on Monday voted overwhelmingly in favor of a motion to ‘hear’ a Palestinian Christian text that describes the State of Israel as ‘a colonial enterprise built on racism.’

“The General Synod is the national assembly and legislative body of the Church of England. It is the only body alongside the UK Parliament empowered to pass national laws for England, and is responsible for setting church budgets and shaping doctrine…

“The Synod ran out of time before the motion could be put to a vote. It will return to the agenda at the next Synod in November. The debate itself, however, showcased multiple conflicting perspectives…”

Fighting With No End

Fortune wrote on July 18:

“Iran just crossed Trump’s red line for resuming all-out war as fighting continues to escalate with no end in sight.”

The President of Iran has stated that total war has begun.

Trump’s Useless Attacks

Politico wrote on July 22:

“Trump’s air war in Iran may be reaching its limits. President Donald Trump is trying to put more pressure on Tehran — but the regime isn’t budging, so far, and there’s no clear endgame for the war.”

Politico explained that air wars have never led to a successful conclusion of a war.

Hiding True Numbers of Wounded US Soldiers

Daily Mail wrote on July 20:

“Dozens of US troops were wounded in three Iranian strikes in Jordan that the Pentagon kept quiet in the week before Friday’s attack that killed two American soldiers and left one missing. [Another American soldier was killed in northern Iraq on Saturday during the controlled detonation of an unexploded Iranian drone.]

“The attacks damaged multiple American helicopters and were never publicly disclosed,… US Central Command (CENTCOM) said last week it was retaliating against Iranian attacks on ships in the Strait of Hormuz, never mentioning the strikes on American troops in Jordan. The discrepancy exposes the tension between what the Pentagon says it must keep secret to protect operational security and its obligation to keep the public informed about the war. 

“CENTCOM is not required to release information about injured troops. … Spokesman Sean Parnell dismissed claims of a cover-up as ‘baseless and malicious’’. Trump’s confrontation with Iran is spiraling toward a far wider conflict as American deaths climb…”

All the American propaganda cannot hide the fact that the war spins out of control and HAS BEEN LOST! According to Iran, the USA has lost 40 soldiers and 400 helicopters in the war.

What Americans Should Not Know

The Jerusalem Post wrote on July 20:

“The Trump administration has… failed to report the cost of weapons used against Iran, and how the regime has retained and rebuilt its current missile capabilities… Last month, wounded US soldiers also told CBS that their injuries were more severe than had been designated by US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth…  

“Sergeant First Class Cory Hicks was one of the dozens hurt in the strike in Kuwait that killed six soldiers. He suffered severe shrapnel wounds and underwent emergency surgeries in Kuwait. A US Army official had told his wife that his injuries were ‘minor,’ he told CBS. CBS cited Hicks as saying that he ‘absolutely’ believed that the Pentagon has tried to downplay the incident.”

Cost of War

ABC News wrote on July 21:

“Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth told congressmembers on Capitol Hill that the war in Iran has cost the U.S. $37.5 billion so far.”

Hegseth is currently asking for a historic $1.5 trillion defense budget. He said that without those funds, “we face critical shortfalls.”

The Houthis Block the Bab el-Mandeb Strait

CNBC wrote on July 20:

“Houthi militants in Yemen on Monday declared a maritime embargo against Saudi Arabia effective immediately, threatening to exacerbate the oil supply disruption triggered by Iran’s attacks on tankers in the Strait of Hormuz.

“The Houthis have repeatedly threatened to close the Bab el-Mandeb Strait during the U.S.-Iran war. The strait is a choke point for commercial ship traffic that connects the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden and global markets.

“The Saudis have diverted millions of barrels of oil per day through a pipeline to an export terminal on the Red Sea. Those exports have acted as a crucial relief valve for global oil markets during the U.S.-Iran war….”

Reuters added on July 20:

“Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthis said on Monday they were imposing a naval blockade on Saudi Arabia, a move that opens a new front against the United States in its war on Iran and widens the threat to global energy supplies and trade beyond the Gulf…

“The full closure of the Bab el-Mandeb strait would reduce global oil supply by 7% as it would leave most of Saudi oil exports unable to leave the region. The disruption would add to the massive cut to global oil flows from the war in the Gulf, which has already reduced shipments by 10% of global supply.”

Deadly Iran War Continues and Spreads…

Daily Mail wrote on July 17:

“Iran has told its citizens to turn off their air conditioning during peak hours as the country’s power grid came under strain amid US strikes… Donald Trump ordered the US military to hit Iranian bridges throughout coastal cities along the Strait of Hormuz… Trump has threatened to broaden the campaign to Iran’s power plants and bridges unless Tehran returns to talks…

“The conflict spiraled last night as Iran targeted Kuwait’s drinking water and power plants with drones and missiles after Trump caused widespread chaos throughout Iran with devastating attacks on their bridges and airports.

“Kuwait is an oil-rich desert nation where everyday life depends on desalination plants, which produce about 90 percent of the country’s drinking water by converting seawater from the Gulf… Kuwait’s government has urged residents to ration electricity to ease strain on the national grid during the height of summer, as soaring temperatures push demand to its annual peak…

“The renewed fighting has been deadly, killing at least 30 people since last week, while oil prices have spiked sharply.”

This is total insanity. Ungodly men do NOT know the way of peace.

Trump’s Illegal Threats

Deutsche Welle wrote on July 22:

“US President Donald Trump has issued a social media post threatening that the US will start striking Iranian infrastructure in response to future attacks on ships in the Strait of Hormuz. ‘From this point forward, any time the Islamic Republic of Iran shoots at a ship in the Strait of Hormuz, whether it be by Missile, Rocket, Drone, or any other device or weapon, the United States will bomb and destroy ONE BRIDGE OR POWER PLANT, including those located next to, or in, the Capital City of Tehran,’ Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. 

“Targeting key civilian infrastructure, such as power generation systems or bridges, is deemed a war crime in international humanitarian law, as is deliberately targeting civilian or commercial shipping.”

Oil Prices Have Rocketed

Daily Mail wrote on July 22:

“Oil prices have rocketed to their highest level in more than a month after Marco Rubio warned the US would keep striking Iranfor as long as it throttles the Strait of Hormuz… Energy markets were being squeezed on three fronts as chaos hit the Strait of Hormuz, the Red Sea and the Black Sea.

“At least two oil tankers bound for the Bab al-Mandeb chokepoint in the Red Sea turned back overnight after Iran-backed Houthi rebels threatened to blockade Saudi Arabia, choking a route that handled 12 percent of global oil flows before the war. Ukrainian attacks on Russian shipping have meanwhile disrupted a third artery, with a key Black Sea terminal halting deliveries of Kazakh oil after strikes on tankers.”

This world is doomed.

“Trump Reality Check Reveals Devastating Record of Damage”

Focus wrote on July 22:

“In a democracy, those in power should do what they say. Donald Trump has violated this principle, as a reality check shows. The US President’s record of damage is devastating… He has violated the supreme principle of democracy—telling the people what you think and doing what you say—in five key areas…

“His promise sounded alluring: ‘From this day forward, our country will flourish again and be respected throughout the world,’ he had promised at the start of his second term… A year and a half later, Trump is a man without friends. He has fallen out with his immediate neighbors—Mexicans and Canadians. He has snubbed his NATO partners to such an extent that some are no longer willing to share their intelligence with the Pentagon… There is no longer a ‘Trump camp’ in Europe that he could rely on. His last friend, Viktor Orbán in Hungary, was voted out of office. The ‘Trump perfume’ no longer seemed alluring, but rather repulsive—like the secretions of a polecat…

“In his inaugural address, he promised: ‘I will instruct all members of my cabinet to fight record-high inflation and rapidly lower costs and prices’… Since that statement, inflation has risen from three percent to a peak of 4.2 percent in May 2026, and currently stands at 3.5 percent… prices… in Trump’s USA [continue] to rise unabated. For instance, the price of ground meat has risen by 24 percent since he took office. Orange juice: up nine percent. Gasoline: up 31 percent. Electricity: up six percent. Milk: up 7.5 percent…

“[Another statement:] ‘Jobs and factories will come roaring back to our country.’… Industrial jobs shrank from 19.6 million in June 1979 to 12.6 million in June 2026—a decline of 36 percent. This process was not reversed during his second term but continued. Another 75,000 blue-collar jobs were lost…

“At the ‘Liberation Day’ event in the White House Rose Garden, Trump was still confident: ‘It is up to us to prosper, using trillions of dollars to cut our taxes and pay down our national debt. And it will all happen very quickly.’… The only thing that happened quickly during his second term was the accumulation of debt. During his second term, he drove the debt level up from the $36 trillion seen in the final year of Joe Biden’s presidency to a [projected] $45 trillion in 2029… [For] the first time in over a century, the USA no longer holds a triple-A rating from any of the major agencies. Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase—the world’s most powerful banker—said earlier this week that he could not currently recommend buying long-term US government bonds. Yet, reluctance to buy drives up interest rate premiums—and with them, US debt…

“In his inaugural address, he promised: ‘We will measure our success not only by the battles we win, but also by the wars we end—and perhaps most importantly: by the wars we are not drawn into in the first place.’… After 547 days in office, the conclusion is clear: Trump has caused explosions and clashes in every direction. Above all, the war against Iran that he initiated and the threats issued against the civilian population will… be remembered… There are no signs of a quick end to the war—and thus a normalization of energy prices.

“Bottom line: American democracy cannot be satisfied with this record of damage. While the president provides a daily spectacle for the media, he is not delivering to his citizens what he promised them…”

And so, Trump has already completely destroyed American democracy.

Trump’s Address a Wasted Opportunity

The New York Post Editorial Board wrote on July 17:

“Election security is a legitimate issue, but President Donald Trump’s primetime speech on the issue was a dud that won’t even help pass the SAVE Act that aims to address the problem. And even most Americans who share his concerns would’ve preferred to hear more about the economy or the war. Trump himself didn’t seem to have his heart in it. His points didn’t always hit home, either: The Chinese have gathered more than 200 million voter files? OK, but what can they do with the info? It ‘includes names, addresses, phone numbers, political party preferences,’ the president reports. But much of that is available in the phone book, and more can be purchased from a host of sources. And if he’s that upset about it, shouldn’t he be raising hell with his Xi Jinping?

“Our electoral system has major vulnerabilities: States like California have gone bananas regarding how they distribute, collect and count ballots; many fail to prune their rolls of people who’ve died or moved away. But there’s still no hard evidence of voter fraud extensive enough to make a difference in any election, barring a very few extremely local races.

“We too favor tighter election protocols, voter-ID laws and other provisions of the SAVE Act, but Republicans don’t have the votes to get it through the Senate and they won’t get them anytime soon. Most important: Election security is nowhere near the top of the list of America’s priorities right now.

“The public’s attention, even to our president, is a limited commodity. A major address demands a major issue, and rehashing horror stories about changes to Michigan voter-registration rules in 2020 ain’t it. In less than four months, Americans will decide what the last two years of Trump’s presidency are going to be about: Growing the economy and creating peace — or impeachment, investigation and socialism.

“If you don’t put that choice front-and-center, Mr. President, the GOP won’t win even if they’re the safest elections ever.”

It seems Trump is totally out of touch with reality and the concerns of the American people. It is hard to see how Republicans could win the midterm elections.

Trump Starts New Trade War With Canada

NPR wrote on July 21:

“President Donald Trump on Monday imposed 50% tariffs on most Canadian goods, declaring that Canada has unfairly discriminated against American autos, alcohol and dairy products. The move could unleash a new wave of economic chaos, with risks of higher inflation and further fraying of relations between two nations that had been closely woven together before Trump’s return to the White House. The administration official previewing the action said that Canada was one of the only nations other than China that retaliated against Trump’s previous tariffs and must be held accountable….

“The new tariffs carry serious political and economic risks for Trump ahead of the November midterm elections for control of Congress. His ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs last year in April provoked a financial market meltdown over concerns about inflation and a recession, prompting him to walk back the rates for a period of negotiation. The Supreme Court ruled this February that Trump had lacked the legal authority to impose the tariffs by declaring an economic emergency, causing the administration to find alternative ways to raise import taxes based on a series of legal authorities…

“The president maintains that the costs created by tariffs will cause manufacturing to relocate to the U.S., though there is little evidence of that in the economic data. The new 50% tariffs would exclude energy products, potash, fish and critical minerals, but they would include goods that had previously been protected from import taxes by the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA. That 2020 trade pact was not renewed by the U.S.”

Total stupidity… Donald Trump… the modern King Midas In Reverse! Trump has now announced that higher tariffs will also be enforced against 60 countries, including members of the EU.

Trump’s Dangerous Arrangements With Saudi Arabia

The Associated Press wrote on July 22:

“President  Donald Trump has approved an agreement with Saudi Arabia that could potentially provide the kingdom with uranium enrichment capability for its civilian nuclear program… The deal is expected to last 30 years and is also expected to involve U.S. firms in developing the program. The deal could allow for the building of a uranium enrichment facility in Saudi Arabia… But the deal, which is expected to be submitted to Congress for review, could face headwinds among lawmakers who fear that helping the Saudis fulfill their long-standing desire to enrich their own uranium would open new rounds of nuclear proliferation and competition.”

The New York Times wrote on July 22:

“The agreement will require review by Congress, which under the Atomic Energy Act has the power to vote a resolution of disapproval. But as a practical matter, the agreement would likely pass, because Congress would have to assemble a veto-proof [two-thirds] majority to override Mr. Trump’s initiative.

“Nonetheless, debate over the accord is likely to be fierce. To get the deal done with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the country’s 40-year-old de facto leader, Mr. Trump had to agree to terms that may limit international inspectors from going to any sites in the country that they think could be a pathway to diverting fuel to weapons projects..

“Prince Mohammed has vowed he would build nuclear weapons if Iran does so, even insisting in one interview he would do so ‘without a doubt.’”

Saudi Arabia will become a fierce enemy of Israel… and possibly the USA. Following the uproar, Trump suddenly announced for the first time that Saudi-Arabia has to first improve its relationship with Israel and become a member of the Abraham Accords. This will not happen.

Jens Spahn’s Controversy and Hypocrisy

Deutsche Welle reported on July 17:

“Conservative politician Jens Spahn and his husband have announced that they have become parents with the help of a surrogate mother in the US… The news has sparked a political debate because such a procedure would be prohibited in Germany.

“A surrogate mother makes her body available to carry a baby to term and is typically paid for doing so. Spahn’s party, the center-right CDU… is staunchly opposed to making this legal in Germany. As recently as February 2026, the party passed a resolution reiterating this at their federal party convention. ‘In light of ethical, legal and practical concerns regarding surrogacy, the CDU of Germany reaffirms its demand that surrogacy — including altruistic models — remain prohibited in Germany in order to prevent abuse, exploitation and health risks,’ read the resolution.

“Jens Spahn, Germany’s former federal Health Minister and currently leader of the CDU/CSU parliamentary group in the Bundestag, was present at the convention. At the time, a surrogate mother based in the US, was already pregnant with the child of Daniel Funke, Spahn’s husband.

“Spahn and his husband don’t have to fear legal consequences. Surrogacy is not prohibited in the US. In Germany, only the doctors and intermediaries involved would be liable to prosecution. It is not illegal in Germany to raise a child who was born abroad to a surrogate mother.

“Throughout his career, Spahn has consistently expressed criticism of surrogacy. In 2015, he told GQ magazine: ‘As a gay man and a Christian, I personally find it very difficult to come to terms with the idea of a “rented womb.”’… In 2020, the opposition neoliberal FDP… sought to initiate a debate on liberalizing Germany’s surrogacy laws, when Spahn was health minister. He opposed the move, citing the CDU’s familiar arguments, but also arguing that surrogacy could lead to ‘particular difficulties in the child’s sense of identity.’ Now, he stands accused of double standards…

“The 46-year-old has weathered plenty of scandals in the past. During the COVID-19 pandemic, he was responsible for the overpriced purchase of protective masks, which later led to legal disputes with suppliers worth billions. Although the scandal continues to haunt Spahn to this day, he has remained politically influential.”

Spahn—the “I-First” Man!

Bild Online published the following commentary on July 16:

“There is nothing right about it when one of the leading politicians and power brokers of the Chancellor’s party circumvents German law while abroad—law that he himself—most recently as Health Minister in 2020—actively denied to all Germans: surrogacy…

“For Jens Spahn, it is about Jens Spahn. HE is fulfilling HIS dream by circumventing—legally, yes—HIS German law. Why? Because he can—and because he can afford it. Spahn’s message of hypocrisy: ‘The law applies to you. I circumvent it—I.'”

Did Spahn learn this kind of arrogance from Trump?

Spahn No Longer Tenable

On July 16, Nius published the following commentary:

“Morality ends where double standards begin… As the most powerful Union politician in the legislature, Spahn has become untenable in his office due to this maneuver. This is not a case of accidental drunk driving or a speeding violation; rather, it is a blatant disregard for the law that makes his conduct—and his continued tenure in this post—completely unacceptable…”

Jens Spahn’s End?

Deutsche Welle wrote on July 18:

“Jens Spahn, the parliamentary leader of the ruling conservative bloc in the Bundestag [the CDU], stepped down on Saturday amid a controversy surrounding his decision to have a child via surrogacy…

“This is not the first time Spahn has faced controversy. As Germany’s COVID-era health minister, Spahn was investigated for alleged misuse of public money. However, state prosecutors dropped their investigation into his COVID-era dealings in March. Spahn was seen as a rising star in the conservative bloc, having been re-elected leader of the parliamentary group with 85% of the vote in May.”

However, Spahn was never liked by many in his own party, nor by the nation as a whole. He survived numerous scandals. To count him out now would be clearly premature.

ntv wrote on July 19:

“Spahn acted exactly as one would expect from someone like him: he confirmed judgments and prejudices about career politicians—ranging from dishonesty to hypocrisy and double standards. Instead of informing his party early on that he—and his husband—were becoming fathers with the help of an American woman, he allowed the CDU to reaffirm its opposition to surrogacy at the party conference in February. It was outrageous to leave his own party looking so foolish. Yet Spahn clung to the CDU/CSU parliamentary group leadership even as anger within the CDU erupted with unprecedented intensity. Not even the deputy chair of a local chapter with a handful of members came to his public defense—he is completely discredited.

“Spahn’s behavior demonstrated a level of selfishness and arrogance that was bound to shock the party. His resignation did not stem primarily from an acknowledgment of his questionable conduct, but rather from immense pressure coming from all levels of the CDU. Reportedly, Spahn was still intent on retaining the parliamentary group leadership as late as Saturday morning. It was CDU Chairman and Chancellor Friedrich Merz who persuaded him to resign…”

Spahn: Germany’s Most Unpopular Politician

Nius reported on July 20:

“Even more unpopular than the Chancellor: Following the surrogacy scandal involving Jens Spahn, the CDU politician has slipped to last place in the INSA politician rankings… In the survey, 62 percent expressed a negative view of Spahn; Friedrich Merz received the same score. The Sauerland native leads Spahn only in terms of approval ratings: 15 percent expressed a positive view of the Chancellor, compared to just ten percent for Spahn…

“The top rankings, however, remain unchanged. Germany’s most popular politician remains—undisputed—SPD Defense Minister Boris Pistorius. He is followed in second and third place by the new Minister-President of Baden-Württemberg, Cem Özdemir, and North Rhine-Westphalia Minister-President Hendrik Wüst… the popularity of AfD leader Alice Weidel continues to rise. She has swapped places with Bavarian Minister-President Markus Söder, moving from fifth to fourth.”

Spahn’s Successor… Not Without Controversy

ntv reported on July 22:

“Thorsten Frei, Head of the Chancellery, is set to succeed Jens Spahn—who has stepped down—as leader of the Union parliamentary group. CDU and CSU leaders Friedrich Merz and Markus Söder officially nominated the 52-year-old today. All 208 MPs were subsequently informed via text message. They will decide on the appointment during a special session next Wednesday.”

Bild Online wrote on July 22:

“The Magdeburg-based Volksstimme views the nomination of Thorsten Frei (52, CDU) as the new leader of the Union parliamentary group critically. In a commentary, the newspaper writes that Frei—during his time as Minister of the Chancellery—was ‘dangerously close to being the wrong person for the job.’ The Baden-Württemberg native is held responsible for too many communication and coordination mishaps within the federal government. The Volksstimme explains Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s (70, CDU) decision to back Frei primarily by citing his loyalty. Unlike Jens Spahn (46, CDU), Frei is considered an ‘unreservedly loyal confidant of Merz.’ This is precisely what makes him the Chancellor’s preferred candidate. The newspaper emphasizes that this personnel decision cannot be seen as a major breakthrough or a liberating move for the government….

“According to the Handelsblatt, the nomination of Thorsten Frei (52, CDU) as the new leader of the Union parliamentary group is viewed with reservations in some quarters of the Union. In a commentary, the Düsseldorf-based business newspaper writes that, for some Union MPs, his close proximity to Chancellor Friedrich Merz (70) is now seen ‘not as an asset, but as a liability’….

“Journalist Ulf Poschardt (59) of the daily newspaper Die Welt… has criticized the nomination of Thorsten Frei (52) as the new leader of the Union parliamentary group. Writing on X, Poschardt stated that with this personnel decision, the Union is adhering to a ‘status quo logic’ when a ‘revolutionary logic’ is actually what is needed. Commenting on the agreement reached by CDU leader Friedrich Merz (70) and CSU leader Markus Söder (59) to appoint Frei as Spahn’s successor, Poschardt concluded: ‘The Union is beyond help.’”

It truly is. But what (or who) will come next?

How Trump Destroyed World Cup Soccer

Deutsche Welle wrote on July 20:

“‘Trump cast a shadow over the entire tournament, weaponizing it for domestic political purposes, regardless of whether he showed up at matches in person,’ Jules Boykoff, a professor in the Politics and Government Department at Pacific University in the US state of Oregon, told DW…. Such unprecedented and direct political intervention… drew scorn and fury from most of the rest of the world — with politicians, football federations, fans and coaches all piling on to criticize. But that won’t bother Trump, Boykoff said.

“‘Based on his actions, Trump does not appear to care much about what the rest of the world thinks of him. His anti-immigration policies stained the World Cup and undercut FIFA’s slogan that ‘Football Unites the World.’ Trump used the tournament to further fracture the world while stoking his base’s worst instincts ahead of the midterm elections,’ he said.”

Trump only cares about himself.

Trump’s Incredible Arrogance

Die Welt wrote on July 20:

“Then, finally, the big moment after 104 matches at the XXL World Cup: Trump and [FIFA President Gianni] Infantino [Trump’s “buddy”] presented the trophy to Spain’s captain, Rodri. Infantino stepped away from the stage, intending to leave the spotlight to the Spaniards. But he hadn’t reckoned with the US President—Trump simply stayed put. Infantino tried to get the 80-year-old to follow him, but without success. So, the FIFA President hurried back to Trump and positioned himself a meter away from the action. Trump spoke briefly with Rodri and then moved aside—by a mere meter. Yet, as the captain hoisted the trophy high, the US President was still standing right there in the huddle of players. In doing so, he ensured his presence in the World Cup victory photos.

“Trump and Infantino were booed by large sections of the crowd.”

The booing was more than justified. Ironically, the Spanish football federation and FIFA excluded Donald Trump from the official World Cup celebration pictures shared on social media.

Corrupt FIFA over Falkland

BBC wrote on July 17:

“The White House has defended the Argentinian football team’s right to free speech after they controversially waved a banner in support of their country’s territorial claim to the Falkland Islands while celebrating their World Cup win against England… The Falklands, a British overseas territory in the south-west Atlantic Ocean, remains the subject of a sovereignty dispute between the UK and Argentina. Players for Argentina held a banner after Wednesday’s semi-final match reading ‘Las Malvinas son Argentinas’, which translates as ‘The Falklands are Argentine’.Speaking to reporters on Friday, Giuliani referenced free speech protections in the US Constitution, saying: ‘We believe in our First Amendment rights here in the United States of America’ [Really? So, why were Iranian soccer players not allowed to say anything critical of the USA or in support of Iran?]…

“For its part, the government of the Falkland Islands said it was ‘disappointed but not surprised’ about the banner and it hopes Fifa will ‘sanction all behaviour of this nature in line with its own rules’… Argentina players also sang chants which referenced the Falklands …

“A brief but bitter war arose between Britain and Argentina over the territory in 1982. A British military task force ejected Argentine forces, who had landed on the Falklands to stake a territorial claim. The 74-day conflict led to the deaths of 255 British military personnel, three islanders and 649 Argentine soldiers.”

Giuliani and the White House are such hypocrites. FIFA’s own rules state (not that they are necessarily being adhered to by FIFA):

“FIFA’s regulations strictly prohibit all political, religious, and personal statements, slogans, or imagery during official matches. Governed primarily by the IFAB Laws of the Game and FIFA’s Stadium Code of Conduct, players and teams can face sanctions—including fines and suspensions—for breaching these neutrality mandates.”

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This is a very interesting question; particularly, when we think of the ages of some of the patriarchs, and we look at the ages of people at other times during the last 6,000 years.   We want to briefly explore the question of life-spans and why King David only lived to the age of 70 when he was considered to be very old, which is not very old by today’s standards.

From the Bible, many people will know that Methuselah was the oldest man who ever lived – he was 969 years old when he died (Genesis 5:27), Jared was 962 (Genesis 5:20) and Noah 950 years old (Genesis 9:29).   The next oldest were:

Adam – 930 (Genesis 5:5)

Seth – 912 (Genesis 5:6-7)

Canaan- 910 (Genesis 5:14

Enosh – (not to be confused with Enoch) 905 (Genesis 5:11)

Mahalalel 895 (Genesis 5:17)

Lamech 777 (Genesis 5:31)

Enoch 365 (Genesis 5:23)

These were all before the Flood around the year 1,656, but after the new beginning with Noah and his family, ages came down dramatically. Some have proposed that in Genesis 6:3, God reduced the life-span of man to 120 years. However, God’s reference to 120 years in Genesis 6:3 has nothing to do with the average life-span of man; rather, it is God’s expression that He would bring the Flood in about 120 years which would destroy all life. Noah was about 600 years old when the Flood came, and he lived many hundreds of years after the Flood along with Shem, Ham and Japheth. Even several generations later, men like Abraham, Isaac and Jacob lived much longer than just 120 years.

There are many theories as to why this should be the case but the Bible doesn’t specifically give us the full explanation. What we can say is that in Genesis 1:31 we read: “Then God saw everything that He had made, and indeed it was very good. So the evening and the morning were the sixth day.”  Man would be formed in, and live in, a perfect world, whereas later man would soon go the wrong way.

One commentator wrote this: 

“The most straightforward explanation may be that as time has ticked on since the Flood, disease and other dangers of this world have simply taken their toll on us. Today, mutations of diseases mean that we have more things trying to kill us now than we did a decade ago. Decay and entropy have likewise broken things down more and more as the centuries go by… with the new world breeding various new diseases and other natural problems that took their toll on Moses and his descendants. A comparison would be how the quality of life in first-world countries dramatically affects lifespans compared to those in third-world countries. In this case, we may consider the living conditions before and after the Flood as so different that lifespans were naturally shortened.”

Others try to explain the shortened life-span of man after the Flood with the disappearance of a water canopy. It is suggested that the pre-Flood Earth was surrounded by a dense layer of water vapor or ice. The canopy was believed to have trapped heat uniformly, producing a mild, tropical climate worldwide, and shielding the Earth from harmful cosmic radiation. When the “windows of heaven” opened, the canopy condensed and collapsed, providing 40 days of rain.

We say the following in our free booklet, “The Theory of Evolution, A Fairy Tale for Adults?”

“… many theologians and scientists state that a vapor canopy once surrounded the earth. Theologians refer to Genesis 7:11 where it says that the ‘windows of heaven were opened.’ They feel this is probably a reference to the pre-flood vapor canopy. Another reference to this canopy can be seen in Genesis 1:6-7, where we read that God made a firmament and divided the waters under the firmament from the waters above the firmament, giving reference to a water vapor canopy. This canopy, scientists explain, would have created a greenhouse effect. This seems to be confirmed in Genesis 2:5 where we are told that the antediluvian world was watered by dew or mist, not by rain. This dew would have been dependent upon humidity, saturation, temperature, dew point and condensation—all made possible through the water vapor canopy.”

That could be an explanation for the shortening of the life-span of man after the Flood, or part of it, but we simply don’t have the direct answer from the Word of God.

Later we see that Abraham died at age 175 (Genesis 25:7) and his wife Sarah lived 127 years (Genesis 23:1).  Their son Isaac lived to age 180 (Genesis 35:28) and Jacob (Israel) lived to be 147 (Genesis 47:28), all long life-spans compared to today but many hundreds of years less than those quoted at the beginning of this Q&A.

Moses wrote the following words in Psalm 90:10: “The days of our lives are seventy years; And if by reason of strength they are eighty years, Yet their boast is only labor and sorrow; For it is soon cut off, and we fly away.”

That would have been true at the time of Moses; it was not necessarily true for the centuries before or since then, nor would it have to be true for us today or for future generations to come.

King David was probably the oldest king except for King Saul who was 70 or 72 when he died. In 1 Chronicles 29:26-28 we read:

“Thus David the son of Jesse reigned over all Israel. And the period that he reigned over Israel was forty years; seven years he reigned in Hebron, and thirty-three years he reigned in Jerusalem. So he died in a good old age, full of days and riches and honor; and Solomon his son reigned in his place.”

We learn this from 2 Samuel 5:4: “David was thirty years old when he began to reign, and he reigned forty years.” And so that would mean that he was 70 when he died.

It is interesting what many Bible Commentaries say about 1 Kings 1:1 which reads: “Now King David was old, advanced in years; and they put covers on him, but he could not get warm.” The margin of some of the New King James Bibles explains that “advanced in years” means “seventy years.” The Authorized Version states that he was “stricken in years.”

Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers points out:

“Stricken in years—about seventy years old. Since ‘clothes’ mean ‘bed-clothes,’ the meaning is that the King was now too feeble to rise from his bed. His life began its responsibilities early; it had been hard and trying; and, as the history shows, not wholly free from self-indulgence. Hence, at no excessive age, its complete decrepitude.”

The Benson Commentary states:

“They covered him with clothes, but he got no heat — Which is not strange, considering he was a person who had been exercised with so many hardships in war, and with such tormenting cares, and fears, and sorrows for his own sins, (as divers of his psalms witness,) and for the sins and miseries of his children and people. Besides, this might be from the nature of his bodily distemper, which Dr. Lightfoot thinks was a dead palsy. (David now began to feel the effects of old age…).”

Barnes Notes on the Bible explains:

“…..the Jews at this time were not long-lived. No Jewish monarch after David, excepting Solomon and Manasseh, exceeded sixty years… The king was evidently bed-ridden (1 Kings 1:47).”

In passing, some disagree with the view that no Jewish monarch exceeded 60 years except for Solomon and Manasseh, as they say that Uzziah was 68 when he died.   Nevertheless, the ages of kings were not long-lived.

The Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary states:

“Now king David was old—He was in the seventieth year of his age (2 Samuel 5:4, 5). But the wear and tear of a military life, bodily fatigue, and mental care, had prematurely, if we may say it, exhausted the energies of David’s strong constitution (1 Samuel 16:12). In modern Palestine and Egypt the people, owing to the heat of the climate, sleep each in a ‘separate’ bed. They only depart from this practice for medical reasons (Ecclesiastes 4:11).”

We want to clarify that we do not necessarily agree with that assessment and especially with the quote of Ecclesiastes 4:11 as proof for sleeping in separate beds.

Gill’s Exposition of the Whole Bible points out:

“…there are many persons at the age he was, that are lively, healthful, and robust, comparatively speaking at least; but David’s strength was impaired, and his natural force abated by his many wars, fatigues by night and day in campaigns, and the many sorrows and afflictions he met with from his family and his friends, as well as enemies; which exhausted his natural moisture, weakened his nerves, and drank up his spirits, and brought upon him the infirmities of a decrepit old age very soon.”

The Pulpit Commentary states in general:

“David’s early hardships and later sorrows and anxieties appear to have aged him prematurely. Possibly he was also afflicted with disease.”

A number of other Bible Commentaries come to pretty much the same conclusions as stated in those already quoted and seem to feel that David’s lifestyle, toils, and hardships contributed to him being feeble, aged and very old. Even though he was “only” 70, he was considered very old in the Bible, based on his condition. In addition, when noting the following explanation, aged 70 could already be described as very old in general terms for people living at the time of David.

On the website “Longevity in the Ancient World,” we read:

“There is little firm information about the collective lives of those who lived in the first centuries BC and the first centuries AD, but the conjecture is that the average life span was about 35 years. The 35-40 average life span of people in the Western world held true through the Dark Ages, the Middle Ages, the Renaissance until the 19th and 20th centuries when modern medicine and its life-preserving discoveries began in earnest. For thousands of years, life was uncertain but it was pretty certain the normal person would not live past 40 years. Ambitious or talented young men, or young men like Herod the Great’s 19-year-old son Archelaus who inherited kingdoms, were forced to grow up quickly because by age 20 their life was already half over. Alexander the Great in the 3rd century BC reigned over his father’s kingdom and commanded the army that would conquer the known world when he was 20. Charlemagne ruled most of western Europe in the 700’s AD when he was 26. Genghis Khan in the 1100’s began building the army that would conquer Asia when he was 20. Chaucer the Father of English Literature wrote his first major work, the Book Of Duchess, in the 14th century when he was 25. Shakespeare wrote his first play when he was 26 in 1590…”

As an example of how life spans have increased in more modern times, we quote from the UK Office for National Statistics:

“In 1841 the average newborn girl was not expected to see her 43rd birthday. Thankfully times have changed and so have life expectancies in the 170 years since the first lifetable was constructed.  The information contained in the Decennial Life Tables release, produced every 10 years, provides a fascinating insight into those changes, spanning three centuries.  In 2011 life expectancy at birth is almost double what it was in 1841.”

And so, when we think about King David being very old at age 70, we may view this through the optics of what we see in life expectancy today or in previous times, and may also have in mind some of the extraordinary longevity of Old Testament examples at the dawn of civilisation and after the Flood.  How things have changed over the centuries!

And they might still change once again. We are told that Christ will rule mankind on earth for 1,000 years, during the Millennium. We do not know what age the people will reach then… how long they will live in the flesh. It is POSSIBLE that some, if not most, will live for close to 1,000 years to qualify before being changed into immortal Spirit beings. We know that people will live for 100 years in the flesh during the Great White Throne Judgment period. 

On June 12, 2013, the BBC website reported that “A Japanese man recognised as the world’s oldest living person, and the oldest man recorded in history, has died aged 116, local officials say. Jiroemon Kimura died of natural causes on Wednesday in a hospital in Kyotango, Kyoto, a government statement said.  In December, Guinness World Records recorded Mr Kimura as the oldest man ever verified to have lived.”

Of course, they are not taking into account biblical examples and the Guinness Book of Records has only been in operation since 1955. We are now more informed about how to prolong our lives through information about health, hygiene, better food supply, nutrition and exercise. Although this Q&A was about King David and his age, we finish by showing just a few examples as to how different it is today. 

In the Countries ranked by life expectancy (2025), we see the following results with the numbers showing the ranking average ages for 201 countries [compare https://www.worldometers.info/demographics/life-expectancy/]:

1. Hong Kong                      85.77

5. Switzerland                     84.23

6. Australia                          84.21

19. Canada                          82.88

20. Israel                              82.77

29. Austria                           82.29

36. Germany                        81.71

37. UK                                 81.60

48. USA                               79.61

201. Nigeria                         54.78

As a footnote to the life of David during his seventy years, we quote from gotquestions:

“God blessed King David with a long and prosperous life. He survived a battle with a giant, multiple attempts by King Saul to murder him, various wars, and a coup led by one of his own sons. In the end, he died of old age. Scripture leaves no doubt that David was of sound mind when he died. Knowing his death was imminent, David was able to give support and guidance to his heir and successor. Despite his many faults, David was admired and respected as a hero by the people of Israel. His dedication to God, loyalty in the face of ill-treatment, courage in war, benevolence in conquest, and faithfulness in friendship were so extraordinary that he would forever be viewed as an ideal king and a man after God’s own heart.”

We might add: David sinned, but his repentance was genuine and sincere. His heart was right, and so he WAS a man after God’s own heart.

Lead Writers: Brian Gale (United Kingdom) and Norbert Link

Compiled by Norbert Link

“The Downfall of Germany’s Most Powerful Politician”

is the title of a new StandingWatch program, presented by Evangelist Norbert Link. Here is a summary:

Jens Spahn resigned, or was forced to do so, due to a scandal which was described as proof for his hypocrisy and arrogance. But would it be premature to rule him out for a vital role in the future? After all, deadly wounds can be healed. Some aspects of his character and personality are worthwhile considering in light of what the Bible says about the coming “beast” in Europe. This program explains in detail what to watch for.

A German AufPostenStehen program was posted with the same topic. The title is: “Jens Spahn—der Fall von Deutschlands mächtigstem Politiker.”

Frank Bruno’s sermonette has been posted, titled, “Our Spiritual Continuing Education.” 

Here is a summary:

As humans we continue to learn new information each day—some more than others, but the point is that there is always new information we can consume and utilize. As true Christians who have been called by the Father we should be eager to learn and be guided by God and by Jesus Christ in matters of our faith. There is nothing more important in our lives than preparing ourselves and serving God and His Son. In this Sermonette we will cover various scriptures that can assist us along the way.

Eric Rank’s sermon has been posted, titled, “Hard Things.” 

Here is a summary:

The life of a Christian is definitively not for the faint of heart. It requires overcoming obstacles, dealing with difficult circumstances, and resisting temptations every single day. To be Christian is to become comfortable doing hard things. Through the examples in the Bible we will learn about those who have gone before us, having faced difficulty, and overcome. We will also learn why it is so important to actively choose to do the difficult things that God directs us to do, because the reward that comes from doing them is great.

Dominik Kaltenegger’s German sermonette from last Sabbath has been posted. It is titled, “Sollten Christen sich bekreuzigen?”(“Should Christians make the sign of the cross?”)

On July 18, 2026, Frank Bruno will present the sermonette, titled, “Our Spiritual Continuing Education,” and Eric Rank will give the sermon, titled, “Hard Things.”

The live services are available, over video and audio, at http://eternalgod.org/live-services/ (12:30 pm Pacific Time; 1:30 pm Mountain Time; 2:30 pm Central Time; 3:30 pm Eastern Time; 8:30 pm Greenwich Mean Time; 9:30 pm Central European Time). Just click on Connect to Live Stream.

Christ is telling us time and again that we must overcome in order to enter the Kingdom of God. We have long understood that this means to be victorious in our fight against Satan, the world and ourselves—our own carnal human nature. 

In his last Editorial, titled “The Wisdom of Self-Control,” Michael Link emphasized especially proper and improper reactions towards accusations and persecutions from others—how self-control can help us not to answer provocations from others with anger or a desire to get even.

In this Editorial, I would like to discuss another aspect of self-control—that of self-discipline in regard to our own ungodly lusts. How careful and committed are we not to fall into the trap of allowing the “old man” to enter and take over our lives again and to tempt us to do things which we know we ought not do? In other words, how careful are we not to give in to our human desires? 

Overcoming our own human nature means not engaging in conduct that we must avoid.  We can do that—with God’s help—when we exercise self-discipline—but it is never easy. 

For instance, Christ told us not to look at the wife of another man with evil thoughts or to lust for her (Matthew 5:28). David should have looked away when he noticed his inappropriate desires for Bathsheba, who bathed in the nude on the rooftop, but he continued to let lust for her take over until sinful actions were the consequence. As James would write later: “…each one is tempted when he is drawn away by his own desires and enticed. Then, when desire has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and sin, when it is full-grown, brings forth death” (James 1:14-15).

Paul cautioned us in Romans 13:14: “But put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh, to fulfill its lusts.”

That is what David should have done, but he failed to exercise proper self-discipline. He knew what to do; he knew that he had to “flee sexual immorality” (1 Corinthians 6:18), but he was too weak to overcome his carnal desires. His lust for Bathsheba led to the sin of adultery which was followed by the sin of murdering her husband Uriah, and David’s punishment was severe. Even though he repented bitterly, he still had to pay dearly for his transgressions.

There is a battle going on in our minds. Our human carnal heart fights against God’s Spirit in us which “yearns earnestly” (James 4:5) for us to do the right things—to overcome and conquer our fleshly desires. Paul cautioned us not to “grieve the Holy Spirit of God” (Ephesians 4:30). But Paul also recognized that far too often, this spiritual fight is lost. He wrote in Galatians 5:17: “For the flesh lusts against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; and these are contrary to one another, so that you do not do the things that you wish.”

Paul recognized many years after his conversion that he was still giving in to his human nature, committing sinful acts even though he did not want to do so. He admitted that he was still “carnal, sold under sin” (Romans 7:14). As a consequence, he did what he hated to do, not even understanding WHY he did it (verse 15). At the same time, he found himself unable to perform what was good (verses 18-19). 

He was in despair, distraught, deeply sorry and dissatisfied with himself when he realized that he had just committed another sin—having followed the evil desires of his heart, lacking self-discipline—and he cried out, in desperation: “O wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death?” (verse 24). But in reality, he KNEW the answer. He knew it all along. The only help could and can come from Jesus Christ. And so he exclaimed, “I thank God–through Jesus Christ our Lord! So then, with the mind I myself serve the law of God, but with the flesh the law of sin” (verse 25). 

Paul knew what to do. He knew what was right. He wanted to do it. But he also knew that only with Christ’s help could he become more and more successful in overcoming his lusts and evil desires. He knew that he had to do his part. He continued to fight against his human nature, wanting to overcome it, to conquer it, to replace it with God’s divine nature. But he also knew that all his efforts would be useless if Christ was not on his side to help him. 

He wrote in 1 Corinthians 9:25, 27: “And everyone who competes for the prize is temperate in all things… But I discipline my body and bring it into subjection, lest, when I have preached to others, I myself should become disqualified.”

That was the danger. He could not tell others to practice self-discipline, while not practicing it himself. He told his beloved disciple and evangelist Timothy what he, Paul, himself had to practice. In 2 Timothy 2:22, he wrote: “Flee also youthful lusts; but pursue righteousness, faith, love, peace with those who call on the Lord out of a pure heart.”

Evil desires and lusts begin in the human heart. Paul asked Timothy to conquer and overcome those lusts, as Paul himself was engaged in the same battle. After all, “youthful” lusts are not only committed by young people.

Paul knew that he could never allow his evil desires to become so dominant in his life that he would become like those who ultimately, “being past feeling, have given themselves over to lewdness” (Ephesians 4:19). Rather, he knew that self-discipline required that he would be “renewed in the spirit of [his] mind” (verse 23). 

As Michael Link emphasized in his previous Editorial that we must have self-control when reacting to the improper conduct of others, this Editorial emphasizes that we must have self-discipline when reacting to the improper desires of our own heart. With Christ in us, we CAN overcome, and when we sin, come to our senses, REPENT of what we did, and confess our sins to God the Father, “He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness” (1 John 1:9). He will do so, because it is “the blood of Jesus Christ His Son [which] cleanses us from all sin” (verse 7). 

This is how we walk and live with God. This is how we overcome. This is how we “are more than conquerors through Him who loved us” (Romans 8:37). This is how we exercise and maintain the power of self-discipline.

By Norbert Link

We begin with the suspiciously sudden and untimely death of Senator Lindsey Graham; continue with Donald Trump’s lost wars in Lebanon and Iran and his ever-shifting contradictory and toothless involvement in the Russia-Ukraine war; speak about America’s genocide; and address the godless spirit of war in Switzerland.

Lindsey Graham Dies Suddenly

Daily Mail wrote on July 12:

“Firebrand US Senator Lindsey Graham has died at the age of 71 after a ‘brief and sudden illness’ [which has not been explained so far]… Emergency services responded to a ‘cardiac arrest’ at Graham’s home… on Saturday night… He has been a close ally of President Trump, a longtime hawk on Iran and an ardent supporter of Israel. … Graham also cheered on Trump’s decision to strike nuclear sites last year and had been a supporter of the latest conflict that started a few months ago…

“Graham never married and is survived by his younger sister Darline Graham Nordone and other relatives. For decades, his status as a long-term bachelor fueled rumors about his sexuality. But in 2018 interview with TMZ, he firmly denied being gay. …

“Graham’s sudden death comes as other prominent Republicans have faced health issues.  Kentucky Republican Senator Mitch McConnell was hospitalized weeks ago for undisclosed health reasons.”

Deutsche Welle added on July 12:

“The exiled son of Iran’s former Shah, Reza Pahlavi, said of Graham: ‘When friends were seldom found, he stood alongside the people of Iran in their struggle against tyranny.’ Graham was also an advocate for the Kurdish people [whom Trump betrayed], particularly in their fight against the ‘Islamic State.’” 

With their bare majority, the Republicans can’t afford to lose any more members in Congress.

Medical Examination To Follow

The Associated Press wrote on July 12:

“The Medical Examiner of the District of Columbia’s preliminary findings are that Republican South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham died of aortic dissection due to arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease, according to a statement released by his office on Sunday. That is when the aorta is damaged or develops a leak.

“The statement also said that the death certificate will be pending until all the toxicological and microscopic testing are finalized. At that point, the death certificate will be updated to reflect the cause of death and appropriately classify the manner of death.”

Whether a “medical examination” will put numerous rumors surrounding the strange and sudden death of Graham to rest remains doubtful. Note the next article.

Was Lindsey Graham Murdered?

First Post wrote on July 12:

“The sudden and unexpected death of veteran US Senator Lindsey Graham has sparked a flood of online conspiracy theories, with Iran and Russia becoming the focus… Graham’s recent Ukraine visit, his push for fresh sanctions on Russia, his long-standing advocacy of a hardline policy against Iran and reports of recent threats from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps have prompted social media users and commentators to question whether there is more to the story.

“While the Russian angle dominates Eastern European discourse, a second, equally virulent wave of conspiracy theories points squarely at Iran. Graham was arguably the most vociferous anti-Iran hawk on Capitol Hill. He spent decades advocating for the total isolation of Tehran, consistently pushed for military action to dismantle its ballistic missile and nuclear programmes, and loudly cheered the Trump administration’s strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.Iranian state television announced Graham’s death in openly celebratory language, describing him as a ‘warmongering and anti-Iranian U.S. senator’ and congratulating Iran on his passing…

“The timeline preceding Graham’s death serves as the primary fuel for the unfolding Kremlin-centered theories. Just hours before his fatal medical emergency, Graham had returned from a high-profile visit to Kyiv—his tenth trip to Ukraine since the 2022 full-scale invasion. Days earlier, Graham had announced progress with the Trump administration on a sanctions package targeting Russia, reinforcing his reputation as one of Congress’s most vocal critics of Moscow.”

That Graham’s death is extremely suspicious is without doubt. Examiners have never been [purposefully?] too successful in explaining suspicious deaths—for instance, the death of Marilyn Monroe or Jeffrey Epstein; and the masterminds behind the murders of John F. Kennedy, Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King. And there are so many other countless suspicious, undisclosed or unresolved deaths and killings.

Suspicions Galore

The Daily Mail added on July 14:

“Trove of horrifying evidence that proves why America must NOT dismiss suspicions about Lindsey Graham’s shock death: Putin expert reveals exactly how Russian agents could have done it…”

NBC News added on July 14:

“President Donald Trump said Tuesday that he is aware of conspiracy theories circulating about the sudden death of his friend and ally, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., but declared ‘the FBI is wasting their time’ investigating the matter… Trump said he was aware that Graham’s father had also died of heart complications at a relatively young age.”

Sorry to say, but when Trump is adamant that there was no foul play involved, then there might very well have been. The mass media is jumping on the bandwagon of “no evidence” for foul play… which is suspicious all by itself.

No Peace in the Middle East

JNS wrote on July 9:

“Israel ‘did not ask anyone for permission to enter Lebanon, and we do not need permission to remain in Lebanon,’ Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said on Thursday, hours after US President Donald Trump said he believed Jerusalem would withdraw from the country. ‘It is our right and our duty to protect the residents of the Galilee and the citizens of Israel from the threats posed by the jihadist Hezbollah terrorist organization, which seeks to destroy the State of Israel,’ Katz said in a Hebrew-language statement…

“As he and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ‘have made clear, we will continue to remain in the security zone in Lebanon and operate from it as long as necessary until Hezbollah is disarmed throughout Lebanon and the threat to the residents of northern Israel is removed,’ Katz vowed. Trump, speaking to reporters alongside Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa at a press conference in Ankara on Wednesday, said he had discussed an Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon with Netanyahu. ‘I talked to Bibi [Netanyahu] about that. I think they’re going to. I think they want to. I don’t think it’s a question,’ the US president said. ‘We have a deal with Israel and Lebanon, and yeah, they’ll leave.’

“The June 26 framework of understandings between Jerusalem and Beirut conditions an Israeli redeployment on Hezbollah being removed from Southern Lebanon.”

Israel and Hezbollah are not part of that “agreement.” How can anyone trust Trump’s “declarations”?

Dangerous Erdogan

The Jerusalem Post wrote on July 13:

“Netanyahu went on American television networks to lobby publicly against an administration policy still under consideration. If Iran’s decline is creating a regional vacuum, Israel fears Turkey is positioning itself to fill it, and that American F-35s, coupled with Trump’s embrace of Erdogan, might help it do so….

“Trump has repeatedly emphasized his close relationship with Erdogan. Indeed, he has gone even further, portraying himself as the man who prevented Turkey from entering the recent war against Iran on the opposite side. ‘He could have gone into the war,’ Trump said. ‘He didn’t because of me.”’…

“Why the president would want to sell state-of-the-art weaponry to a leader who he himself said had contemplated joining a war against the United States and Israel is almost beside the point. …

“Turkey’s ambitions are hardly viewed with alarm only in Jerusalem. For Greece, Ankara’s increasingly assertive posture is reflected in repeated airspace violations over the Aegean and long-running disputes over maritime boundaries. For Cyprus, it is embodied in Turkey’s continued occupation of half of the island. For Armenians, opposition to a stronger Turkey is rooted in the national trauma of the Armenian Genocide and Ankara’s continued refusal to acknowledge it.”

The Bible contains terrible predictions for the future of Turkey and maybe for Erdogan himself… because of their gruesome hostility towards Israel.

American-Israeli Failed Coup to Bring Former Iranian President Back to Power

The Daily Mail wrote on July 13:

“Former Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has been put under house arrest by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps after intelligence authorities uncovered his secret dealings with Israel… For years, Israel conducted a covert operation aimed at grooming Ahmadinejad as an intelligence asset who, when the time came, could be installed as Iran’s new leader, American and Iranian sources [said].  Israel even secretly transferred money to Ahmadinejad for housing and travel, while operatives met him abroad on several occasions. The discovery of the secret relationship is shocking given that Ahmadinejad was known for accelerating Tehran’s nuclear programme, calling regularly for the destruction of Israel and denying the Holocaust…

“The ambition was to set in motion the toppling of the current regime, and to install Ahmadinejad as leader, who had been living under strict surveillance in Tehran. But the grand plan failed. On February 28, Ahmadinejad’s compound was struck by an Israeli airstrike aiming towards the building of his bodyguards and his armoured vehicle. Following the strike, a black Peugeot car arrived, picked up Ahmadinejad, and took him away at high speed from the dramatic scene, according to four senior Iranian officials. The vehicle was driven by agents of Mossad, Israel’s foreign intelligence service, who whisked Ahmadinejad away to a secret safe house in Iran, American and Iranian officials said. But the former Iranian president was discontented with the chaotic rescue operation, and apparently appeared disillusioned about Mossad’s plan to return him to power…

“A second element involved training Iranian Kurdish opposition forces located in northern Iraq, arming them with weapons, and ordering them to cross into western Iran, where they would hold territory and eventually move toward the capital Tehran. This effort never came to fruition… The regime-change mission involved a ‘sequence of special operations, very, very unique, that was supposed to happen,’ Tamir Hayman, a former head of intelligence for the Israeli Defence Forces, told the PBS talk show ‘Firing Line’ in May. ‘And Ahmadinejad was part of that sequence.’…

“Ahmadinejad’s 2024 trip to the university in Budapest and a second one the following year were part of a yearslong Israeli initiative to install him as Iran’s new leader. He was such a priority for Israel that the country’s then-Mossad chief, David Barnea, even flew to the Hungarian capital in 2024 to talk with Ahmadinejad personally… Soon afterward, they said, Mossad contacted the CIA to confirm that it had been in discussions with Ahmadinejad… Ahmadinejad began writing public letters in 2017 to Trump and later to Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. The US president lavished praise on both figures.”

Deutsche Welle added on July 16:

“Haaretz also wrote that the operation involved much more than Ahmadinejad and included infiltration plans inside Iran, contacts with minority groups and that there was also discussion of a broader destabilization strategy… The details have not been independently verified and remain unconfirmed. However, Ahmadinejad’s office has reportedly rejected the claims, describing them as ‘absurd’ and ‘completely false.’”

What an idiotic plot that would have been. It would show again the degree of incompetence prompting Israel and the USA to attack Iran with their “goal” of “regime change.”

Trump’s Middle East Trap

Bild Online wrote on July 11:

“Trump wants to extricate himself from the [Iran] war—but he cannot. Yet almost every tactic has already been employed: a twelve-week air war alongside war partner Israel. Then a ceasefire. Afterward, a mutual declaration of intent to hold peace talks… even an easing of sanctions… At first, he praised the new leadership under Khamenei’s son Mojtaba (56) as ‘rational’; more recently, he reviled them as ‘scum’—liars whose word is worthless. In between: wild threats…

“Americans call wars that get bogged down a ‘quagmire’—the most famous examples being Vietnam and, later, the Iraq War. Trump’s Iran offensive is already shaping up to be just such a mess…

“Now, he must also solve a problem that did not exist before the war: The battle for the oil route through the Strait of Hormuz—now apparently blocked again—looms once more! Following Iranian attacks, only two tankers managed to make the passage on Thursday morning. Furthermore, the Iran War complicates Trump’s entire Middle East policy…

“Domestic pressure is mounting: The unpopular war is driving up prices… Trump’s fellow Republicans are increasingly standing up to him. Former US military intelligence officer Michael Pregent warns BILD: ‘The greatest danger is that, in the end, this war will have been fought for nothing.’”

Who can still doubt the incompetence of Trump and his spineless or incapable “advisers” regarding the Iran War?

Iran War Without End

Deutsche Welle wrote on July 12:

“Iran reacted to the latest round of US strikes on its territory by saying they have ‘rendered futile’ the diplomatic efforts of the past few months.

“According to a foreign ministry statement cited by the AFP news agency, the US military strikes ‘has caused the return of insecurity to the Strait of Hormuz and disruption of international commercial shipping.’”

Trump declared the Strait was open again—a blatant misrepresentation.

More Idle Threats

Politico wrote on July 11:

“U.S. President Donald Trump said that the American military stood ready to ‘completely decimate and destroy all areas of Iran’ in response to threats to his life….”

The only way Trump could “completely decimate and destroy all areas of Iran” would be through the use of nuclear weapons. He apparently considered this possibility before but was fortunately “dissuaded” from carrying it out.

Now Trump Wants to Charge Ships?

Politico wrote on July 13:

“President Donald Trump on Monday said the U.S. will take over the Strait of Hormuz — and will be reimbursed ‘at the rate of 20% on all cargo shipped’ for overseeing one of the world’s most critical oil passageways that has been at the center of the U.S.’s re-escalating war with Iran. ‘We will become guardians of the strait,’ Trump said during an interview with ‘Fox & Friends’ on Monday morning…

“Trump followed his Fox News interview with a Truth Social post that said the U.S. will reimpose a blockade on Iran. All other countries will have fair and open use of the Strait,’ he said, but added that ‘as a matter of FAIRNESS, [the U.S.] will be reimbursed, at the rate of 20% on all cargo shipped, for any and all costs necessary to do the job of providing safety and security to this very volatile section of the World.’”

Crazy. Note the next article.

The Associated Press wrote on July 13:

“The International Maritime Organization, the United Nations agency which oversees safety and security measures in international shipping, said… ‘There is no legal basis through which to introduce mandatory tolls simply to transit through a strait…’”

But Trump’s threats did not endure for long.

Trump’s Ever-Changing Threats

Bild Online wrote on July 14:

“The escalating conflict between the US and Iran is keeping the economy on edge. On Monday, the US President caused a stir in the Gulf states when he announced plans to impose a kind of 20 percent toll on ships in the Strait of Hormuz. By Tuesday afternoon, however, he had backed away from this idea. A ‘total blockade’ of Iranian ships was to remain in place, though; the country’s ‘deceitful, violent, and malicious leadership’ left him no other choice… After ‘very productive talks’ with leaders in the Middle East, he decided to replace the levy with trade and investment agreements that the Gulf states would conclude with the US…”

Is there anything one can rely on when Trump makes an “announcement”? Trump’s threats seem simply ridiculous.

The War That Never Ended

Politico wrote on July 13:

“President Donald Trump formally notified lawmakers this weekend that the nation is once again at war with Iran, giving his administration another 60-day clock to use the military in the region without congressional approval… Trump had previously notified lawmakers in May that the war launched in February had ‘terminated,’ thereby negating a 60-day legal deadline under which military operations must halt without congressional authorization.”

The prior notification was clearly misleading. The war had never ceased.

Cuba Invasion Next?

CBS News wrote on July 15:

“As the U.S.-Iran war restarts following the collapse of the weeks-long ceasefire, senior Pentagon officials are also quietly eyeing another flashpoint much closer to home: Cuba. 

“Military planners have in recent weeks examined a range of options for possible action against the island, including an Army-led air assault involving thousands of U.S. soldiers to be carried out by the 101st Airborne Division, the only unit trained for such a task… Cuba has presented new security challenges… Cuba [has]  acquired attack drones of unknown origin.”

Trump’s Toothless Pledge to Help Ukraine

Newsmax republished on July 10 the following article by The Associated Press:

“President Donald Trump’s pledge to give Ukraine a license to produce Patriot air-defense systems could mark a major breakthrough for Kyiv, but experts and Ukrainian officials warn that turning the idea into real weapons would likely take years.

“[Trump’s “pledge”] left open a crucial question: What exactly would Ukraine be allowed to produce?… Trump’s wording was ambiguous because he referred broadly to producing ‘Patriots,’ without specifying whether he meant missiles, launchers, radar systems, command centers or components…

“Even if Ukraine received complete component kits from abroad…, it would likely need at least 18 to 24 months to launch its first pilot production line, followed by more time to complete the first weapons…”

Trump’s declaration that there was “love in the room” during the NATO summit sounded good, even though extremely silly and doubtful… but in any event, there was really nothing substantive behind it.

Russia’s Lack of Trust in the West

The Times of India wrote on July 10:

“Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Moscow no longer trusts Western calls for negotiations, arguing that previous agreements and security guarantees related to the Ukraine conflict were not honored.

“Speaking at a public event, Lavrov claimed Russia’s ‘reserve of goodwill and hope’ toward the West has been exhausted, citing failed diplomatic efforts in 2014, 2015, 2019, and 2022.”

Border Controls Between Gibraltar and Spain to Be Abolished

Focus reported on July 15:

“Every workday, thousands of Spanish commuters cross the border into Gibraltar—a process that has often resulted in long wait times. This is set to change starting July 15: under a post-Brexit agreement between the EU and the United Kingdom, the border is being largely removed after 118 years, significantly easing freedom of movement between Spain and Gibraltar…

“For the region, this is considered a historic step, primarily due to Gibraltar’s economic importance. While Gibraltar ranks among the wealthiest territories in the world, the adjacent Spanish region is characterized by high unemployment.

“However, the new agreement brings not only opportunities but also new rules. Gibraltar will align itself more closely with the EU Customs Union and the Schengen Area. Consequently, goods in Gibraltar will have to comply with EU regulations. In addition, new taxes are being introduced, including a transaction tax that replaces the previous import duties.”

And so, the United Kingdom will ultimately lose Gibraltar—one of its last sea gateways—to Spain and the EU.

Germany’s Path Into the Abyss

Die Tagesschau reported on July 9:

“Germany will purchase US ‘Tomahawk’ intermediate-range weapons and station them in Germany. An agreement to this effect was reached with the US side at the NATO summit in Ankara, said Chancellor Friedrich Merz (CDU) in his government policy statement to the Bundestag… ‘And at the same time, we will work on developing our own European systems and stationing them in Europe,’ said Merz.

“The cruise missiles have a range of 2,500 kilometers—meaning they could fly from Germany deep into Russian territory. Moscow is 1,600 kilometers from Berlin as the crow flies. European NATO states do not yet possess their own intermediate-range weapons…

“[Merz’s] goal is ‘an economically strong, socially just Germany capable of defending itself both internally and externally…’ The Chancellor explained that the answers offered by radical parties—whether from the left or the right—do not shape the future. ‘They divide our country and, should they assume political responsibility in Germany, would lead it into the abyss.’”

Many feel that Merz has already led Germany into the abyss.

American Mass Murders

Life News wrote on July 9:

“More than 66 million babies have been killed in abortions in the United States since the Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision… The Roe ruling alone is responsible for more than 64 million deaths through mid-2022, with the overall figure surpassing 65 million by early 2025 and estimates now placing it at approximately 66 million.

“In June 2022, the Supreme Court overturned Roe in the Dobbs decision, returning authority over abortion to the states [a move supported by Trump]. Many states promptly enacted protections for unborn children. These measures led to abortion center closures in pro-life states and initial drops in abortions there. The abortion industry responded by shifting resources to pushing women to travel across state lines for abortions and by expanding access to dangerous chemical abortion pills through telemedicine and mail delivery…

“The cumulative death toll from abortion since Roe now stands at an estimated 66 million babies. It’s a heartbreaking figure that shows abortion is genocide.”

It is indeed genocide, and America will pay dearly for it.

Trump Insists Terrible ICE Policy Must Continue

The Guardian wrote on July 15:

“The White House overturned a one-day old homeland security department (DHS) memo that said they would be halting traffic stops in the wake of recent stops that left two men killed in the space of a week on Wednesday morning… On Tuesday, federal officers across the US had been told to temporarily stop pulling drivers over. That directive came after ICE agents fatally shot Lorenzo Salgado Araujo in Houston on 7 July and Joan Sebastián Durán Guerrero in Maine on Monday. Both men were unarmed, neither was the intended target of the operation that killed him, and in both cases the agents involved wore no body camera to record what had happened.

“The president’s Wednesday declaration made no mention of either killing… The whiplash from the post initially rebuked his own homeland security department, which had just spent a day trying to contain the fallout from back-to-back killings…. Civil rights groups have called both shootings extrajudicial killings…. None of that appears to have registered with the Trump, who instead said that attempt to hold ICE accountable should be blamed on ‘Radical Left Dumocrats.’”

And so, human life does not seem to have any more value in America, and the killing of innocent people will continue.

Swiss New Military Law—Godless and Respectless

SWI (Swissinfo.ch) wrote on July 10:

“The requirement for priests and monks to serve in the Swiss army from June 1 has angered Swiss Churches. The three main national Churches and the Network of Evangelical Churches have expressed their discontent and demanded action in a letter to the government…

“Religious communities are particularly incensed that the government no longer considers pastoral care, and therefore the spiritual support of the population, as essential. ‘This is simply incomprehensible,’ the Churches wrote… Alain de Raemy, head of military affairs at the Swiss Bishops’ Conference and auxiliary bishop currently in charge of the diocese of Lugano, describes the government’s decision as ‘a lack of respect for the population.’

“[The] army added: ‘The increasing secularisation of society means that fewer and fewer people feel connected to the Church’s offerings.’ According to the authorities, pastoral care is no longer even ‘an activity essential to maintaining social life’...

“According to the army, nine clergymen have already been recalled since the change in the law. The Swiss Evangelical Network said five additional requests for exemption are expected to be rejected soon. An army spokesperson stated that, in addition to pastors, members of religious orders and monasteries are also affected.”

The godless spirit of war is engulfing the world.

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

The “Kings of the East” are first mentioned in connection with the “beast” or the “King of the North”—a charismatic political and military leader of German or Austrian descent who will still manifest himself in Europe. The “beast” will lead ten European nations or groups of nations. He will carry out a terrible martyrdom of true Christians (Revelation 6:9-11), which might last for 3 ½ years (during the time of the Great Tribulation).

When that religious persecution of God’s servants is taking place, the beast will invade the Middle East, including Egypt, Libya and Ethiopia. He will enter the Glorious Land and conquer Jerusalem, and his forces will, at the same time, successfully attack the modern nations and peoples of Judah (the Jews) and of the House of Israel (the English-speaking nations of the USA, the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and others). The beast will apparently use nuclear weapons against the modern House of Israel, especially the USA and the UK, as all their major cities will be destroyed or laid waste in this war (compare Ezekiel 6:6; 35:4). Those of the House of Israel who survive these terrible events will become captives of the beast, mainly in Europe. The Bible does not say that the beast will use nuclear weapons against the Jewish people in Israel.

The beast will be supported by Turkey (biblical Edom). While Turkey does not appear to be part of the ten European core nations, it will, with unspeakable cruelty and hatred, murder many Jews, after having made an agreement with the beast to wipe out the name of “Israel.” God’s punishment of Turkey will be extremely severe.

After the European war against the modern Houses of Israel and Judah has begun, the King of the North or the beast will hear troublesome news “from the east and the north” and “he shall go out with great fury to destroy and annihilate many” (Daniel 11:44).

Please note that the news from the east and the north shall trouble him. In the Bible, there is no single word for north-east. The reference here can refer to both the east and the north. This troublesome news will stem from and involve the “Kings of the East”—a confederation of many Far Eastern nations.

The European forces, under the leadership of the beast, will attack the Kings of the East, as those rumors might indicate that these Far Eastern nations are planning an attack on Europe and the Middle East. At first, the European nations will use weapons that will not kill, but only torment their enemy for five months (Revelation 9:5). At that time, the beast will be, for whatever reason, unwilling to start a full-fledged nuclear war against the Kings of the East—perhaps also because its war with the USA and the UK is still ongoing.

Nevertheless, the beast’s attack on the Kings of the East will be gruesome. The five-month torment of the beast’s war machines “was like the torment of a scorpion when it strikes a man” (Revelation 9:5). The pain will be so severe that“men will seek death and will not find it; they will desire to die, and death will flee from them” (verse 6).

Even though the European weapons will, at first, “only” harm people without killing them, this will quickly change as we read in Daniel 11:44 that ultimately, as the war drags on, the King of the North will “destroy and annihilate many” of the Far Eastern people.

The Kings of the East will retaliate with brutal force. They had been restrained by four angels but were now released to cross the Euphrates [it does not say that the river had dried up at that point] to kill many Europeans. They will use sophisticated nuclear weapons of mass destruction and kill one-third of mankind (Revelation 9:18), showing that the effect of their actions will not be limited to just European nations. As will be discussed, other passages tell us that ultimately, Europe will be destroyed by these Far Eastern nations, and the beginning of this destruction will undoubtedly commence with this counterattack, but additional attacks will follow. This also shows that the Kings of the East were not altogether unprepared for such military action by the beast, and that the beast’s concern about a Far Eastern attack will not have been unjustified.

In Revelation 9:16, John states that he heard that the number of “the army of the horsemen” of the attacking Kings of the East was 200 million. The Life Application Study Bible (1996) writes that “In John’s day, this number of mounted troops in an army was inconceivable, but today there are countries and alliances that could easily amass this many soldiers.”

Some would dispute this. But there are other explanations for this huge number. We should note that Revelation 9:16 literally says that John heard “the number of armies of the cavalry two myriads of myriads…” The word for “cavalry” is hippicon, which is derived from hippos, meaning “horse.”

Some claim the reference to the huge number of horses is strictly symbolic; others state that the army describes a force of 200 million demons. But since the emphasis is on the “horses” or tanks and other deadly weaponry, the thought should be considered that the tanks are not directed by human beings, but by robots. Especially Far Eastern nations are already heavily engaged in creating and cloning dangerous artificial intelligence (AI) machines. The terrible influence of AI must by no means be underestimated, and especially true Christians must be very careful not to engage themselves too closely with AI manipulations which could indeed be of demonic origin.

The initial attack of the beast on the Kings of the East and their retaliation on Europe begin at the time described in the Bible as the “Day of the Lord” (Revelation 6:17)—which commences about one year prior to Christ’s return. But that war will continue.

We read in Revelation 16 that the Kings of the East are now preparing to strike a final blow in an effort to win the war. This will take place just prior to Christ’s return… maybe just a few days or weeks before Christ’s Second Coming. The Kings of the East will be crossing the now dried-up river Euphrates to move their armies and equipment to a place called “Armageddon,” to assemble there with the apparent desire to advance toward Jerusalem to defeat the beast (who will by that time be in Jerusalem, having planted “his tent of his palace” there; Daniel 11:45). It is Satan and his demons who will assemble the Kings of the East, the beast and the false prophet [a religious leader working with the beast] as well as all the armies of the world to this place, called Armageddon (Revelation 16:12-16). Please note that it does not say that a battle will take place at Armageddon; only that all the armies of the world will assemble there.

Armageddon (in Hebrew Har Megiddo, the “Mount of Megiddo”) sits at the western edge of the Jezreel Valley. Megiddo is located roughly 18 miles southeast of Haifa and 25 miles southwest of the Sea of Galilee, as well as 75 to 90 miles (120 to 125 km) north of Jerusalem.

But even prior to or during their move towards Armageddon, the Kings of the East will continue their war through Europe. They will defeat Europe under the leadership of the modern Medes, who will be part of the Kings of the East. Isaiah 13:17-19 describes the destruction of modern “Babylon” (Europe) through the hand of the modern “Medes.” Verses 6, 9 and 13 designate the timing as occurring during the “day of the LORD.”

In ancient times, the Medes lived in present-day Iran. Originally under Assyrian rule, they revolted against and expelled the Assyrians and imposed their rule over the Persians. They then attacked Nineveh and overthrew the Assyrian Empire. Under Cyrus the Great, the Medes and the Persians were considered one people. The Encyclopedia Britannica (ed.1959) points out that at least some of the Medes were not Iranians or Indo-Europeans, but perhaps connected with the numerous tribes of the Caucasus. The modern Medes, then, are to be found in modern Russia and surrounding areas, including Ukraine.

The historian Herodotus wrote in Terpsichore, 9, that the Medes began to settle throughout South Russia and present-day Ukraine. He stated: “They say that they are a colony of Medes.” Pliny wrote in Natural History, book VI, section xi, that the people who colonized the lands along the river Don claim to be “descended from the Medes.” The Church of God has long held and taught that the modern Medes can be found today among the Russian and Ukrainian peoples who will be instrumental in leading the Far Eastern nations to destroy Europe.

So, Russia and Ukraine will be fighting together, as part of the Kings of the East, against Europe. Today, both nations are fighting each other. But this war will end, and they will combine their forces against the West, especially Germany and continental Europe. We don’t know whether Russia will overtake Ukraine, or whether the two nations will reach an amicable agreement. What we DO know is that finally, they will work hand-in-hand to defeat and destroy Europe.

As mentioned, it appears that before or while moving toward the place called Armageddon in the Middle East, at least parts of the armies of the Kings of the East will sweep through Europe, creating devastating havoc there. Jeremiah 51:27-28 refers to horses as coming up against Babylon like bristling locusts, indicating that they will use some of their tanks and their air force to destroy modern Babylon. They will be led primarily by the modern “Medes”—the Ukrainians and the Russians.

They will apparently destroy and burn the city of Rome—the religious capital of the revived Roman Empire—the city built on seven hills (Revelation 17:9,18).

But we also find that the ten end-time European kings or kingdoms will turn against the religious power and its seven-hill city and “make her desolate” (verse 16), apparently confiscating her property. This depicts the coming strong European alliance between church and state, which is prophesied to crumble. Ultimately, modern Babylon—the religious and economic European system, as well as the city of Rome—will be destroyed in one day (Revelation 18:8) and in one hour (verse 17).

The Bible does not give us all the specifics as to how, exactly, the destruction of the religious system and the city of Rome will occur; that is, whether or not the Medes or the Kings of the East and the ten nations or its leaders will independently turn on the “fallen woman” (the religious power), or whether there will be some limited collaboration between those powers.

In addition, as the ancient Medes destroyed ancient Nineveh—the capital of the Assyrian Empire—, so the modern Medes will also destroy modern Nineveh, capital of modern Assyria or Germany, which would be Berlin today. (Some have suggested that this capital may be Vienna, the capital of Austria).

Much has been written about the fear of a nuclear war between Russia and Germany. This war will indeed take place, and in the process, the modern Medes will totally destroy the modern city of Nineveh, but only AFTER the modern European-Babylonian Empire will have attacked and conquered the USA, the United Kingdom and the State of Israel.

Iran will participate in Europe’s destruction. In Isaiah 21:2, we find a description of the destruction of modern Babylon through the modern Medes and the modern Persians (Iranians). It says: “Go up, O Elam (Iran)! Besiege, O Media!” A future alliance between Russia, Ukraine and Iran (which is already developing today) is not surprising, given the fact that these powers were allied in the past as the “Medo-Persian Empire.” It appears that after their mutual attack on Jerusalem, modern Babylon will turn against Iran and enslave the Iranian people; and that Russia and Ukraine will intervene and free the Iranians; and that Russia and Ukraine, together with Iran, will attack modern Babylon.

While assembling at Armageddon, the Kings of the East and all the other armies moving there will suddenly feel threatened by another “enemy,” and being influenced by Satan and his demonic powers, they will combine their forces with the kings of the whole world (including the beast power) to attempt to defeat that common foe. That “foe” is none other than the returning Jesus Christ, His saints, and His angelic armies. In light of the end-time mania and demonic belief in UFOs, USOs and other demonic apparitions, the worldly and godless armies might perhaps think that Christ and His angels will be an army of hostile aliens with spaceships who are coming to destroy the world. The Bible shows us that Christ will thoroughly defeat and destroy all these worldly armies at the great battle at Jerusalem, when His feet stand on the Mount of Olives.

But this is not the end of the story of the Kings of the East.

After Jesus Christ has set up His rule on earth and the Millennium has begun, the Kings of the East—those who were not part of the army destroyed by Christ at Jerusalem—will again try to conquer the Promised Land. This attempt will occur after the Houses of Israel and Judah have been freed from slavery by Christ and settled peacefully in the Promised Land (Ezekiel 38:8, 11-12). It will be at that time that they will know that God is “the LORD their God from that day forward” (Ezekiel 39:22).

Ezekiel 38 identifies the identity of the hostile nations and armies. This gives us a clue as to who the nations of the Kings of the East will be that will attack Europe and that will invade the Middle East prior to Christ’s Return. 

Ezekiel 38:2–3, 5, 6 speaks of “Gog, of the land of Magog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal,” as well as “Persia, Ethiopia (Hebrew: Cush) and Libya (Hebrew: Put),” “Gomer and… the house of Togarmah.” “Gog” means “mountain” or “high” and seems to be a reference to a commander (compare also verse 7: “be as guard [or commander] for them”).

Magog has been understood as a reference to the Mongols—or more generally, China

As Gog is identified as being “of the land of Magog,” and also as “the prince of Rosh, Meshech and Tubal,” it appears that at that time, Gog, the leader of the future Kings of the East and the nations under his command, will be Chinese. At the time prior to Christ’s Return, when the Medes were leading the Kings of the East, their commander seems to have been from Russia or Ukraine.

Some translations, such as the NIV, render Ezekiel 38:2-3 in this way: “… set your face against Gog, of the land of Magog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal… I am against you, O Gog, chief prince of Meshech and Tubal…” But in the footnote to verse 3, the NIV states: “Or the prince of Rosh.” However, omitting the reference to “Rosh” as a people and replace it simply with “chief ruler” makes little sense, as Meshech and Tubal are correctly described as peoples as well.

The New Luther Bible 2009 renders these two verses as follows: “Turn against Gog, who is in the land of Magog and the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal… I will come to you , Gog, prince of Rosh, Meshech and Tubal…”

“Rosh,” meaning “blond,” is a reference to the White Russians or Ukrainians. “Meshech” is another designation for the city of Moscow, and “Tubal” for the city of Tobolsk. Meshech and Tubal, being sons of Japheth—the father of the Eurasian peoples—and brothers of Gomer and Magog (compare Genesis 10:2), seem to refer here to the Great Russians. Included in this entire description are the vast regions in northern Eurasia extending from the Baltic to the Pacific.

Persia (Elam in Hebrew) designates modern Iran; and Ethiopia (Cush in Hebrew) includes the people of Ethiopia, but also peoples in Central and Southern India and parts of Sri Lanka. Cush’s sons, Seba and Raamah (Genesis 10:7), and Raamah’s son Sheba (same verse), were later worshipped by Hindus as the gods Shiva and Ramah.

Libya (Put in Hebrew) includes the people of the state of Libya, as well as people from Northern and Central India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. As we read earlier that Ethiopia and Libya will be conquered by the beast prior to Christ’s Return, they will not be part of the Kings of the East at the time just prior to Christ’s Return, but they might become part of that collaboration after Christ’s Return, unless in Ezekiel 38, Cush and Put don’t refer to the nations of Ethiopia and Libya, but exclusively to the peoples of Southern India, Sri Lanka, Northern and Central India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Perhaps all these countries are included in this collaboration of the Kings of the East after Christ’s Return.

Gomer seems to designate the peoples from the Asian steppes and deserts, including people from the region of Mongolia. Finally, the reference to “Togarmah from the far north” (Ezekiel 38:6) has been understood as a reference to the people living in Siberia.

We note that certain other Far Eastern countries are not mentioned in Ezekiel 38, such as Japan, Korea and the Philippines, but it is highly likely or at least conceivable that they will be part of the Kings of the East prior to Christ’s Return.

We read in the 38^th and 39^th chapters of the book of Ezekiel that God will supernaturally intervene and destroy those warring nations.

But even that war at the beginning of the Millennium might not end the story of the Kings of the East. A similar attack on Jerusalem will occur when the Millennium is ending and Satan is “released from his prison” for a short while. He will “go out to deceive the nations which are in the four corners of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle, whose number is as the sand of the sea” (Revelation 20:7–8).

We know that this is not the same incident as the one described in Ezekiel 38 and 39, as major differences are listed. For instance, Revelation 20:8 speaks of the hostile nations which are in “the four corners of the earth,” while Ezekiel 38:15 and Ezekiel 39:2 say that they come from “the far north.”

Also, the nations referred to in Revelation 20 might not have to be identical with those mentioned in Ezekiel 38 and 39, but they could just be mentioned symbolically in the book of Revelation to signify those who are opposing God and following Satan. Still, this passage might very well describe the final attempt of the Kings of the East and of all those from all over the world who follow them under Satan’s lead, to rebel against God and His people.

They will try to conquer Jerusalem, but God will supernaturally destroy them (Revelation 20:9), as He had done to the Kings of the East about 1,000 years earlier.

This will end the story of the Kings of the East, as revealed in Scripture. Never will they fight in war anymore, and never will they again oppose God and His people.

Lead Writer: Norbert Link

Compiled by Norbert Link

“The Sabbath – God’s Gift to Humanity” is the latest short video that has been posted on YouTube.

Norbert Link’s German sermon for this Sabbath has been posted. It is titled, “Was sagt uns die Bibel über die “Könige des Ostens“? (“What does the Bible tell us about the ‘Kings of the East’?”).

Paul Niehoff’s first split sermon from last Sabbath has been posted. It is titled, “Gentleness or Kindness.” 

Here is a summary:

Gentleness or kindness is an important part of the fruit of the Spirit. It is mentioned a number of times in the epistles of the apostle Paul and elsewhere, and shows us one aspect of character that we need to apply in our relationships with both Church members and others we come across in our daily lives.

Rene Messier’s second split sermon from last Sabbath has been posted. It is titled, “Enduring to the End.” 

Here is a summary:

In this sermon, we are looking at how the Church of God was persecuted throughout its history and emphasize the importance of enduring to the end by remaining close to God.

Tahir Coban’s German sermonette from last Sabbath has been posted. It is titled, “Sollten Christen auf Fleisch verzichten und vegetarisch oder vegan leben?“ (“Should Christians Abstain From Meat and Live a Vegetarian or Vegan Lifestyle?”) 

Marc Voeller’s German sermon from last Sabbath has been posted. It is titled, “Wie in den Tagen Noahs” (“As in the Days of Noah”). 

On July 11, 2026, Paul Niehoff will present the first split sermon, titled, “Gentleness or Kindness”; and Rene Messier will give the second split sermon, titled, “Enduring to the End.”

The live services are available, over video and audio, at http://eternalgod.org/live-services/ (12:30 pm Pacific Time; 1:30 pm Mountain Time; 2:30 pm Central Time; 3:30 pm Eastern Time; 8:30 pm Greenwich Mean Time; 9:30 pm Central European Time). Just click on Connect to Live Stream.

Thinking before we act is something we all strive to do on a daily basis, yet in moments of pressure, offense, or emotion, we can respond too quickly and regret it later. Proverbs 16 teaches that while people may believe their own ways are right, God weighs the motives of the heart. It reminds us to commit our plans to God, trust His guidance, value honest words, listen to instruction, avoid pride and conflict, and practice patience and self-control. Proverbs 13:16 says that “Every prudent man acts with knowledge, But a fool lays open his folly.” This contrasts wisdom with foolishness by showing the importance of thinking carefully before taking action. 

This principle especially applies when we are offended or confronted. When someone says something hurtful, false, or even partly true, our first reaction may be anger, defensiveness, or a desire to get even. But God expects us to respond with wisdom, patience, and self-control. Even when we must stand up for what is right, especially when defending biblical Truth, how we answer matters. We should not respond in a way that becomes offensive or sinful. In heated situations, instead of blurting out the first thing that comes to mind, we should pause, pray, and ask God for the right words.

Jesus Christ is the perfect example of wise action. Throughout His life, He was questioned, ridiculed, tempted, and tested by people who opposed Him. Satan also tempted Him directly after His baptism, twisting Scripture and appealing to human nature. Yet Christ responded with wisdom, Truth, and self-control (compare Matthew 4:1-11). He did not sin, even when confronted repeatedly. His example shows us that we must know God’s Word well enough to answer wisely and resist deception.

As Christians, we are called to imitate Christ, as it says in 1 Corinthians 11:1.  Through baptism and receiving the Holy Spirit, we are given access to God’s power, wisdom, and understanding. However, we still have a part to play. We must continue studying, praying, meditating on God’s Law, attending Church services when able, fellowshipping with others of like mind, and consistently practicing God’s Way of Life. God’s Holy Spirit helps us make right choices, grow in faith, and become more like Christ, but we must actively use that gift (compare Ephesians 3:16-20; 4:13).

The Bible also warns us about offenses, which can cause people to sin or lead others away from God. We must recognize both the offenses that come from others and those that may come from within ourselves. Christ warned about the seriousness of causing others to stumble, and we should regularly examine our own attitudes, words, and actions (compare Matthew 18:6-7). 

Many people may be offended by what we believe, just as many were offended by Christ. The Pharisees tried to trap Him, question Him, and prove Him wrong, but He always answered with wisdom and authority (compare Matthew 12:1-14; Mark 12:13-17). Likewise, our beliefs may be challenged by friends, family, co-workers, or others. We must be prepared to respond with Truth, but also with the right Spirit.

Ultimately, we face the same kinds of trials, temptations, and tests of faith that Christ faced. Our knowledge, faith, patience, and self-control are tested by how we respond when offended or pressured. We must let wisdom lead and direct our actions, seek God’s guidance, and follow Christ’s example in every situation. Our goal is to answer wisely, act righteously, and grow toward the perfection that God desires for us.

By Norbert Link

We begin with President Trump’s ridiculous interference in the soccer world, causing even more damage to America’s reputation and credibility. 

We continue with Russia’s and China’s military cooperation—angering Germany—and Germany’s suppression of a Russian channel ousted in Europe. We also point out Germany’s and Europe’s plans for insane rearmament spending.

We address this week’s NATO summit and the hope to keep Trump under control, while his relationship with Erdoğan becomes more and more problematic.

We publish further articles proving that Trump and Israel lost the Iran war; and we conclude with Trump’s desire to be added to Mount Rushmore and how he inadvertently unites the Catholic Church and approvingly revives the memory of one of America’s darkest chapters in history. 

Please view our new StandingWatch program, titled, “Sheer Madness… What on Earth Is Going On in Europe?”

The World Against Trump

The Guardian wrote on July 6:

“Fifa’s willingness to bow to the wishes of Donald Trump by lifting the suspension of the USA striker Florian Balogun for the host side’s World Cup last-16 game against Belgium was criticised strongly on Monday, with European politicians, football associations and the governing body Uefa condemning the decision. In an unprecedented intervention in the middle of a tournament, Uefa accused Fifa of crossing ‘a red line’ by making an ‘incomprehensible and unjustifiable’ decision to rescind Balogun’s automatic one-match ban, which it claimed undermined ‘the integrity of the game and the credibility of the competition’… the US president made three calls to Fifa urging an intervention after the 25-year-old was sent off…

“In a move that will reignite a long-simmering conflict with Fifa, Uefa claimed that the world governing body had ignored its own rulebook for political reasons… The Royal Belgian Football Association expressed its own ‘astonishment’ at the decision, with the national team manager, Rudi Garcia, comparing it to an April Fools’ Day joke. The RBFA has also received strong support from some of its European counterparts. The German Football Association questioned whether the outcome was the result of political interference, and said that Fifa’s credibility was at stake….

“… the England head coach, Thomas Tuchel, criticised the decision following his side’s thrilling 3-2 win against Mexico that secured their place in the last 16, where they will meet Norway in Miami on Saturday. Tuchel said: ‘Where does it end now?…’”

The new designated German coach Juergen Klopp also condemned FIFA’s decision and Trump’s involvement in the strongest terms, saying these two people (Trump and controversial FIFA president Gianni Infantino), “who know nothing about soccer,” should stay out of the game and leave it to us.

Although, objectively speaking, Balogun’s foul did not warrant a red card, Trump’s interference and the about-face by his sycophant Infantino are truly outrageous. Naturally, all of this once again damages the global reputation of the USA—Trump and FIFA lost all respect long ago anyway—as well as that of the American soccer team. Trump even admitted that he did not even know what a red card was.

Europe Must Oust Infantino—and Trump Is Intolerable

Bild Online wrote on July 6:

“It is a scandal the likes of which football has never seen! US President Donald Trump calls FIFA boss Gianni Infantino (a Swiss, Italian, and Lebanese national) and ensures that the suspension of US star Balogun—imposed following a controversial red card—is lifted so he can play in the World Cup again. There is a massive global outcry. The values ​​of the game are being trampled upon. The time for standing by and watching the FIFA boss’s shameless conduct must end now…

“The uprising must… be led by the powerful Europeans. The nations that send 60 to 70 percent of the stars to the tournament—Germany…, England, France, and Spain—along with UEFA, must join forces. Condemn Infantino’s machinations. NOW!… It is time to send a clear signal. And since Infantino is unlikely to leave voluntarily—being far too obsessed with power—UEFA should at least threaten to leave FIFA, and, if necessary, show strength and actually go through with it.

“We must not stand by and watch as the football we all love so much is taken away from us for good! The very thought of Trump and Infantino presenting the World Cup trophy after the final on July 19 is already unbearable.”

In another article, dated July 6, Bild Online commented:

“Have you lost your mind, Mr. President? Please stay out of this! As a football fan, I’m used to a lot by now—World Cups in rogue states, transfer fees completely divorced from reality. But the fact that the most powerful man in the world is now apparently interfering in the World Cup as if it were a video game really takes the cake… Is politics going to step in from now on whenever football matches don’t go the way people want?… Six months before the World Cup, Trump received a peace prize from Infantino that had been cooked up on the spur of the moment. And now, another gift between cronies?”

Wars have started over far less.

“Belgium Avenges the Football World”

Bild Online wrote on July 7:

“The football world was watching this World Cup match very closely! Belgium knocks out the last World Cup host, winning the Round of 16 match against the USA 4–1 and advancing to the quarter-finals against European champions Spain on July 10…

“For the Belgians, this success is a source of special satisfaction—the Europeans are avenging the football world!… Substitute Romelu Lukaku scores the 4–1 goal from ten meters out…—sealing the victory of retribution!”

Trump’s ridiculous stunt achieved nothing—except to once again turn the world against him. But given his incredible arrogance, he seems completely indifferent to that. Perhaps he even enjoys it. In any case, Belgium’s well-deserved victory is a case of poetic justice.

China vs. Germany

Kyiv Post wrote on July 5:

“Chinese and Russian military forces will hold joint naval and air exercises in Chinese territory this July, marking further military cooperation between the two nations, Bloomberg reported… The announcement of the Joint Sea-2026 exercises comes shortly after Germany summoned the Chinese ambassador for urgent diplomatic talks on Friday, July 3. The meeting was prompted by reports that Chinese military facilities secretly trained Russian soldiers last year.

“The German Foreign Ministry confirmed it had requested the meeting following Reuters’ revelations that the training had been personally approved by Russian Defense Minister Andrei Belousov… ‘Anything that enables Russia to continue its war of aggression against Ukraine also threatens our security,’ a German foreign ministry source told Reuters. ‘China’s decisive and growing support for Russia’s brutal war of aggression directly impacts our security.’

“The Chinese embassy in Germany denied the allegations, labeling them ‘entirely unfounded.’”

China, Russia, North Korea, India, Pakistan and other Far Eastern countries, including Ukraine, will form the biblical “Kings of the East.”

European Censorship and Suppression

EU News wrote on July 2:

“The Court of Justice of the European Union has clarified that the ban on disseminating content from the Russia Today (RT) channelalso applies to those who operate a website that is freely accessible to the public and funded solely by users’ voluntary contributions. The ruling stems from criminal proceedings brought in Germany against three individuals accused of repeatedly publishing videos from the RT Germany channel on a freely accessible website…

“Across the EU, ‘operators’ are not permitted to broadcast RT content following the restrictive measures adopted in the context of Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine… [The Judge was] clarifying that the concept of ‘operator’ encompasses any person responsible, directly or indirectly, for making prohibited content available, even in the context of an unpaid activity. This classification does not depend on either the scope or the duration of the dissemination.

“Only this interpretation, the Court emphasises, makes it possible to prevent the spread of Russian propaganda and to protect public order and the security of the Union…”

The criminal prohibition also includes the dissemination of written articles of RT in Europe. It reminds us of the book-burning mania of the Nazis prior to and during World War II. And even citing from a RT article is prohibited if it is cited as stemming from a “valid or objective news source.”

And who is protecting us from German or European or American propaganda?

How to Keep Trump on Board of NATO?

Deutsche Welle wrote on July 4:

“NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte is working to keep the alliance united and Donald Trump engaged. But disputes over burden sharing, US military commitments, and the Iran war are creating a major test for NATO unity…

“Just days before a crucial NATO summit kicks off in Ankara on July 7, Rutte was doing what has become one of, if not his most, important tasks: keeping Donald Trump on board. The summit will bring together the leaders of NATO’s 32 allied countries at a moment of growing uncertainty amid heightened tensions in the Middle East and Russia’s ongoing war with the Ukraine.

“As the US reviews its military posture in Europe, many European governments are worried about how committed Trump remains to the security alliance.

“An important part of the Ankara summit will also be to secure further support for Ukraine, including potential new billion-dollar funding pledges to strengthen the country’s defense and security.

“According to news agency AFP, NATO’s European members and Canada will pledge to give Ukraine 70 billion euros ($80 billion) in military aid both this year and next at the upcoming Ankara summit. But tensions persist among European allies about sharing the burden.”

Unpredictable!

Politico wrote on July 8:

“President Donald Trump spent his first hours at the NATO summit publicly bashing the alliance and reciting a list of grievances that had allies fearing the worst. Then he went behind closed doors and changed his tune… The president was far more positive on Wednesday, when he gave a final 30-minute speech… The shift was a notable about-face for a president who has threatened repeatedly to leave the alliance — and came after European leaders heaped praise on Trump for helping ensure allies boosted their defense spending. But those in attendance weren’t clear what specifically changed his stance….

“His remarks represented a sharp turn from his condemnations on Tuesday and Wednesday when he lambasted NATO for failing to help with the Iran war and bristled at Spain’s refusal to spend more on defense. Trump went so far as to call for the U.S. and other countries to cut ties with Spain….

“The turnaround also underscores why European leaders remain on tenterhooks around the president, who relishes his own unpredictability. America’s carefully crafted diplomatic statements are increasingly a relic and what Trump says at one meeting may not represent his views at the next… But the tension is far from settled…”

No Future for NATO

ntv wrote on July 4:

“For the former Green Foreign Minister [Joschka Fischer], the transatlantic alliance is on the verge of collapse… and, in that event, he advocates for a European alliance with its own nuclear umbrella… Fischer said the only alternative is… the Europeanization of NATO…

“However, he spoke out emphatically against a national German nuclear umbrella: ‘For historical reasons, that would be very counterproductive.’… It is only because of the US presence that no one has had to worry until now about the potential resurgence of aggressive German nationalism. ‘Without the US, the situation changes. That is why we are already facing a potential loss of trust in Germany,’ the former foreign minister warned.

“In this context, Fischer criticized the German government’s communication—such as the announcement that the Bundeswehr should become Europe’s strongest conventional army. ‘I have doubts about whether that needs to be trumpeted so loudly. We must take our neighbors’ concerns seriously. We need a sense of our history and an understanding of the reactions it triggers in others.’ What is needed, he said, is sensitive communication—something he does not currently see coming from the German government.”

Germany has never been known for sensitive communication.

Germany a Major Military Power

Caliber wrote on July 6:

“Former NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has welcomed Germany’s growing defence role within the alliance, saying the country is on its way to becoming a major military power…Stoltenberg also cautioned against taking NATO’s long-term future for granted, saying the alliance’s continued existence cannot be guaranteed…

“Stoltenberg said European NATO countries have begun investing more heavily in defence, pointing to Germany as a notable example…”

Insane Rearmament Spending

Cryptobriefing wrote on July 6:

“Europe just decided it’s done relying on American security guarantees. The continent’s response: borrow an almost incomprehensible amount of money and start building weapons.

“The ReArm Europe initiative, unveiled on March 4, 2025 by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, aims to mobilize nearly €800 billion across EU member states to strengthen defense capabilities through 2030. Germany, the economic engine of the continent, is at the center of this shift, reforming its constitutionally enshrined debt brake to unlock potentially €400 billion in additional defense spending.

“The €800 billion figure isn’t Germany alone borrowing that sum. It’s a pan-European mobilization effort combining national budgets, joint procurement programs, and EU-level borrowing. Of that total, roughly €150 billion will be borrowed directly at the EU level to support member states’ needs for air defense systems, missiles, and drones…

“The obvious winners are European defense contractors. Companies involved in missile production, drone manufacturing, air defense systems, and military technology are positioned to absorb a massive wave of procurement spending.”

With these weapons, millions upon millions of people will be killed.

USA Too Close to Turkey?

Israel Today wrote on July 6:

“Concerns grow in Jerusalem that Donald Trump may grant Turkey military concessions, thereby weakening Israel’s strategic position in the Middle East... The unusually harsh statement by Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan that Israel has become ‘a burden humanity can no longer bear’ is no longer being viewed in Jerusalem as merely another verbal exchange between Israel and Turkey. Rather, Israel sees it as part of a broader escalation in relations…

“Israel’s foreign policy and security establishment understands that the decisive question is no longer what Erdoğan or his foreign minister says, but what concessions Trump may grant Turkey as part of his efforts to draw Ankara closer to Washington once again.”

Trump’s Crazy Commitments Towards Turkey

ABC News wrote on July 7:

“President Donald Trump, during the first day of the NATO Summit in Ankara on Tuesday, said he will consider allowing Turkey to buy American F-35 fighter jets — despite possessing Russian-made air defense systems, which his first administration sanctioned the country for six years ago…

“In a 2020 release, Trump’s former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said those systems ‘would endanger the security of U.S. military technology and personnel and provide substantial funds to Russia’s defense sector, as well as Russian access to the Turkish armed forces and defense industry.’…

“Trump later said the U.S. had an ‘obligation’ to maintain the engines of planes Turkey has bought because Turkey, he said, has been ‘more helpful’ on Iran than other NATO countries. Trump again lashed out at other NATO allies for their reluctance to join U.S. military operations in reopening and patrolling of the critical Strait of Hormuz. ‘I was very disappointed with NATO,’ Trump said. ‘And frankly, if it weren’t held in Turkey, where my friend happens to be a very strong leader, a very strong person, it’s possible that I wouldn’t have attended… Italy turned us down, and Germany turned us down and France turned us down… They’ve [The Turks have] been extraordinary in many ways with respect to our relationship, including trying to end the war with Iran, or whatever you call it, it’s not even a war, it’s a military operation, it’s a denuclearization, that’s really what it is, of Iran…”

What absolute nonsense. Not a war with Iran? And Trump’s good friend Erdogan—an Antisemite, mass murderer and autocrat—helped the USA? Turkey will turn against the USA and Israel. Trump is building a Frankenstein monster.

Erdogan—the Leader of the Muslim World?

Politico wrote on July 7:

“Erdoğan remains an uncomfortable peacekeeper for much of NATO. At home, he has spent the last year methodically dismantling what remains of Turkey’s political opposition…  and deploying riot police to storm the headquarters of the country’s main opposition party…. He also maintains an open line of communication with Moscow even as European allies demand a harder line on Russia. Europe doesn’t love any of it… What appalls Europe about Erdoğan doesn’t appear to bother Trump,…

“… he is more than the president of Turkey. He is the leader of the Muslim world. He is the key interlocutor between North and South, East and West, the inheritor not of Ataturk but of the Ottoman sultans,’ said one former senior administration official who served in both the first Trump and Biden administrations… ‘This is a role history and destiny have granted him, and no one else in the world has this kind of presentational ability.’”

Trump’s and Netanyahu’s Lost Iran War

Former British diplomat Alastair Crooke of the Strategic Culture Foundation wrote on July 6, 2026:

“The prediction of a popular uprising in Iran has proved to have been a strategic mistake of such bearing that per contra, it catalysed a stronger, more defiant and assertive Republic…. now we have civil war inside the White House over Iran – Vance vs Rubio… For now, the oil coming out of the Persian Gulf is not heading to the U.S…. even were tankers to head to the U.S. now, the U.S. would still face a serious deficit of sour crude until 23 August at the earliest, given the 42 days voyage time to the U.S….

“The expected triumph of Israel over the Middle East has failed. The connected revolutionary war on Russia and the siege of China are faltering also…

“… some in Israel – including senior military figures – are already lamenting Israel’s assassination of the Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, on 28 February 2026 – ‘At least we knew where we stood with Khamenei’, a senior Israeli military source told Ben Caspit. ‘[Khamenei] had red lines, he had a strategy, and he was sober to some extent. There was a certain stability to the Iranian madness. The current leadership is much less stable, far more extreme and unpredictable. They are intoxicated by power and hubris, convinced that they defeated both America and Israel.’”

Hezbollah Will Not Be Disarmed

The Ron Paul Institute wrote on July 3:

“Mint Press News posted there is a possibility US ground troops will be sent to Lebanon to tackle the impossible task of eliminating Hezbollah… In addition, The Washington Post reported on June 30 the US military has a plan to put ‘troops on the ground’ in Lebanon to assist the Lebanese military and Israel disarm Hezbollah….

“Hezbollah cannot be permanently dismantled without regime change in Iran and dismantling its domestic financial system and political power… In the Lebanese general election of 2022, Hezbollah secured fifteen seats in the Parliament… Hezbollah is the most prominent of Lebanon’s political movements, and has long been the most powerful in the country…

‘On June 30, Hezbollah reiterated its opposition to the framework agreement. Senior official Mahmoud Qamati characterized the accord as ‘stillborn,’ cautioning that the resistance movement ‘will not permit its implementation’ and will ‘oppose it using all available means… Despite a stillborn or deadlocked framework, France and Italy are preparing to deploy an international coalition force to southern Lebanon, supported by the United States… The U.S. and the EU are funneling millions of dollars into the Lebanese military, with the EU recently adopting a EUR 100 million assistance measure to help the state restore its authority…

“Israel, the United States, France, and Italy will not be able to disarm Hezbollah…”

And Europe supports the Lebanese army. The conflict between the USA, Israel and Europe is getting stronger.

Iran’s New Leadership: Younger, Savvier, Ruthless and Even More Hard-Line

Reddit wrote on July 24:

“After surviving months of strikes by the U.S. and Israel, the Iranian regime has emerged emboldened… Iran ‘might be weaker when it comes to its economic situation, its industries, some of its strategic capabilities,’ said Raz Zimmt, head of Iran research at the Institute for National Security Studies in Israel. ‘But the bottom line is that we are facing a new, bolder, self-confident Iran.’

“Even those perceived as moderates by the Trump administration were shaped by years spent in security agencies or war zones. Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, speaker of the Iranian parliament and a main representative in peace talks with the United States, served as an IRGC commander during the Iran-Iraq war.

“By contrast, Iranian leaders with civilian backgrounds largely have been sidelined as part of the war-driven shake-up, officials and experts said. They include President Masoud Pezeshkian and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who previously led talks with the United States but has seen his position and influence diminished. The swift consolidation of power by loyalists contradicts claims by President Donald Trump that the war accomplished ‘regime change’ and empowered pragmatists willing to acquiesce to U.S. demands.”

Trump lost this war big time. Note the next article.

One of the Worst Foreign Policy Moves

Ron Paul wrote on the Ron Paul Institute on July 6:

“President Trump was reportedly ‘shocked’ to see many thousands of Iranians in the street mourning at the funeral of the country’s late leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, over the weekend… ‘I thought they hated him,’ Trump said of the murdered religious leader of Iran. Not only did the Iranian people not rise up to replace their leadership with one friendly to Washington, but the society seems to have become even more cohesive and patriotic….

“In Soccer when you kick the ball into your own goal, it is referred to as an ‘own-goal.’ That is what President Trump achieved with his attack on Iran on February 28th. In fact, it was not just one ‘own-goal,’ but a series of them. The blunder will likely go down in American history as one of the worst foreign policy moves in our history.”

Peace Deal Over

The Huffington Post wrote on July 8:

“Just weeks after admitting he agreed to a peace deal with Iran to avoid a global economic calamity, President Donald Trump on Wednesday said the deal was ‘over’ and disparaged the same leaders he recently praised as moderate and reasonable as ‘scum’ who could not be trusted…

“His comments came after the U.S. military announced another round of attacks on Iranian targets around the Persian Gulf, which were in response to Iranian attacks on oil and natural gas tankers trying to pass through the Strait of Hormuz using a channel not approved by Iran.”

How Trump Unites the Catholic Church

New Lines Magazine wrote on July 3:

“For the first time, a sitting U.S. president publicly questioned the legitimacy of a pope’s election. And Pope Leo XIV refuses to back down from confronting him. The conflict between perhaps the two most famous Americans on the planet has no historical precedent, not least because Leo XIV is the first American pope. ‘It is an event that evokes the historical clashes between the papacy and the empire,’ Giovanni Maria Vian, historian and former editor of L’Osservatore Romano, the Holy See’s daily newspaper, told New Lines. He described the confrontation between the pope and the U.S. president as ‘unprecedented’ …

“Half a year ago, shortly before the first anniversary of Leo’s papacy, a senior Vatican diplomat was summoned to the Pentagon. This was not a courtesy call. Some sources inside the Holy See described the meeting as a confrontation: U.S. defense officials allegedly warned that Washington had the military power to act as it pleased and that the church had better take its side. That meeting marked the beginning of a rupture without precedent in the modern era. President Donald Trump has since questioned the legitimacy of the pope’s election, posted an AI-generated image of himself as Jesus, and declared he is ‘not a fan of Pope Leo.’ Leo, for his part, has said he has ‘no fear of the Trump administration’ and has continued to speak out….

“The relationship between the U.S. and the Holy See is at its lowest point since it was formalized in 1984. But what Trump does not seem to understand is that his outbursts are proving remarkably helpful in achieving one of the key objectives that led to Leo’s election. The new pope after Francis was expected to have two priorities: to prevent a world war and to reunite the Catholic community. Leo was elected in part to calm the disputes between conservative U.S. cardinals and the Vatican. It is no coincidence that his election came above all at the behest of American cardinals anxious to restore Vatican finances….

“Trump’s insults are helping Leo to effect reconciliation within the deeply fractured American Catholic Church…. Since the day Trump accused Leo of being ‘terrible for foreign policy,’ America’s bishops have rallied around Leo in ways they never did with Francis.” 

And so, Trump is inadvertently fulfilling biblical prophecy once again, without having any clue that he does.

America’s Marriage Laws

Israel 365 News wrote on May 5:

“Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce got married Friday night at Madison Square Garden, and the man who sealed the deal was not a priest, not a judge, not a chaplain flown in from a Manhattan cathedral. It was Adam Sandler, star of Billy Madison and The Waterboy, presiding over one of the most-watched weddings of the decade with all the rabbinic authority…

“Here is the part that ought to make headlines of its own. According to the state of New York, Sandler did not need a seminary degree, a house of worship, or a single day of religious training to legally marry two of the most famous people on the planet. Any adult can apply for a One-Day Marriage Officiant License in New York State and stand at the altar, no questions asked. Sandler filled out a form. That is the entire ordination process….

“… the ease with which American law hands out marriage authority for an afternoon says everything about how far the modern wedding has drifted from the Bible’s own definition of the institution.”

Sandler, a Jew, officiated over a “Christian” wedding.

Adding Trump to Mount Rushmore?

Daily Mail wrote on July 4:

“Donald Trump has long boasted that his record is deserving enough to be added to Mount Rushmore, but the President seems more convinced now than ever as he drops hints about his inclusion on the historic monument…

“Trump shared an AI-generated video depicting a gold-plated engraving of Mount Rushmore with his face added to the far right of the monument, alongside Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Theodore Roosevelt…. The Trump administration also heavily hinted at Trump’s addition to the monument, handing out cookies on Air Force One showing his face etched in the mountain alongside Lincoln.”

What record? Trump’s haughtiness and pride are truly remarkable.

Repeating One of America’s Ugliest Chapters?

NPR wrote on July 4:

“President Donald Trump ushered in the 250th anniversary of American independence on Friday with soaring rhetoric about American exceptionalism before veering into a darkly political speech with warnings about a sinister threat of communism that evoked one of the country’s ugliest chapters. ‘Communism is a mortal threat to American liberty,’ he said from Mount Rushmore. ‘It is the greatest threat to our country, including World War I, World War II, Pearl Harbor or even 9/11.’…

“Trump’s language evoked the Red Scare of the 1950s, when alleged communists were persecuted and blacklisted from jobs across America, from Washington to Hollywood….”

This was indeed one of the darkest chapters in America’s history, and Trump’s revoking ofthis ugly and inhumane conduct is indeed a deeply alarming development.

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

The best place to begin is by understanding where and in what context prophecy makes a reference to Egypt and the nation of Israel.

The earliest point in time that prophecy references Egypt, in respect to the nation of Israel, occurs shortly after Israel makes their escape during the time of the Exodus. Towards the end of Israel’s wandering in the wilderness, Moses pronounces blessings on obedience to God and cursings on disobedience. He presents many of the curses as prophetic events, many to still take place in the future. “The LORD will strike you with the boils of Egypt, with tumors, with the scab, and with the itch, from which you cannot be healed” (Deuteronomy 28:27). “Moreover He will bring back on you all the diseases of Egypt, of which you were afraid, and they shall cling to you” (Deuteronomy 28:60). Moses prophesies these and many more terrible consequences to Israel in his warning against disobedience. The sicknesses of Egypt can be expected in fulfillment of end-time prophecy.

In addition to the sicknesses, Moses refers to a future time of slavery. “And the LORD will take you back to Egypt in ships, by the way of which I said to you, ‘You shall never see it again.’ And there you shall be offered for sale to your enemies as male and female slaves, but no one will buy you” (Deuteronomy 28:68). Of the conditions considered when understanding Israel’s experience in Egypt, slavery stands out as the most prominent. It is clear from this passage that the same slavery that Israel experienced in Egypt will again take place.

Hosea prophesies of a future time when modern descendants of Ephraim, who are identified below, will be punished for their disobedience to God and following the way of sin. He references a return to Egypt as well, “…Now He will remember their iniquity and punish their sins. They shall return to Egypt” (compare Hosea 8:11-13). In addition to this return to Egypt, Hosea states that Ephraim will not literally be in Egypt, but rather, in the land of modern-day Assyria. “They shall not dwell in the LORD’s land, But Ephraim shall return to Egypt, And shall eat unclean things in Assyria” (Hosea 9:3). We do not see the specific details about what exactly the return to Egypt entails here, but it is a clear allusion to the conditions they lived in during the time of their bondage before the Exodus, while physically being in the land of modern-day Assyria, which today is mainly Germany. Since this passage references Assyria as the place in which the people of Ephraim will eat unclean things, this implies that the return to Egypt is a symbolic return to slavery, not a literal return to the land of Egypt.

Isaiah prophesies a future time when the remnant of Israel will experience conditions similar to the days in which they were slaves in Egypt while they will be captive in Assyria. This reinforces the prophecy of Hosea. “Therefore thus says the Lord GOD of hosts: ‘O My people, who dwell in Zion, do not be afraid of the Assyrian. He shall strike you with a rod and lift up his staff against you, in the manner of Egypt’” (Isaiah 10:24). This passage further supports the fact that the modern-day descendants of Israel will suffer subjection and abuse like ancient Israel did during their Egyptian slavery. This passage makes it even clearer that the reference to Egypt represents the conditions symbolically, explaining that they will be abused in the same manner. This abuse will take place in a different land.

While the remnant of Israel will return to the condition of Egypt in the land of Assyria, a remnant of Judah will return to literal slavery in Egypt. “So it shall be in that day: The great trumpet will be blown; They will come, who are about to perish in the land of Assyria, And they who are outcasts in the land of Egypt, And shall worship the LORD in the holy mount at Jerusalem” (Isaiah 27:13). This reference shows the time that follows the return of Jesus Christ, when the “outcasts” will come out of the literal land of Egypt. Assyria will not be the only place in which people will be taken captive. We prove below that the outcasts in the land of Egypt refer to the people of Judah.

From this Q&A, “What will be the future relationship between major Middle Eastern Nations and Israel?” we explain in more depth how to interpret prophecies of Egyptian slavery as they apply to Israel and Judah.

“Regarding EGYPT, we read that Jews will be enslaved in Egypt just prior to Christ’s return. Isaiah 27:13 explains that when the great trumpet sounds ‘in that day’—designating the resurrection of the just from the dead in the end time–captives from the Houses of Israel and Judah will be released from slavery. We are also told that prior to their freedom, some will perish in the LAND of Assyria, and some will be outcasts in the LAND of Egypt.

“Hosea 9:3 states that Ephraim (mainly the UK, but by extension including the USA, Canada and other English-speaking nations) shall return to Egypt and eat unclean things in Assyria. On the other hand, Hosea 11:5, 10-11 informs us that Ephraim shall not return to the LAND of Egypt; rather, it will go into the kind of ‘Egyptian’ slavery which ancient Israel experienced when it was in Egyptian captivity. The modern king ruling over the modern House of Israel (including the UK and the USA) will be Assyria. Deuteronomy 28:68; 17:16 confirms as well that ‘Egyptian’ slavery is decreed over both the Houses of Israel and Judah.

“According to Isaiah 27:13, a part of the enslaved remnant will return from the LAND of Egypt. Since Ephraim will not be enslaved in the LAND of Egypt, it follows that those who will be enslaved in the LAND of Egypt will be mainly those from the House of Judah (the Jews). This fact is supported in Joel 3:19, which tells us that Egypt will become a desolation, because of their violence against the people of JUDAH or the Jews.

“Zechariah 10:10-12 tells us as well that some (apparently referring to Judah) will be freed from slavery and brought back from the LAND of Egypt, while others (Ephraim) will be freed from Assyria.”

The examples set forth so far explain a dreadful time in the future when the modern-day descendants of Israel and Judah will experience a return to “Egyptian” slavery. We get a sense of what this return to Egypt means from the context, but to fully comprehend what those conditions will be like, we need to review what ancient Israel actually experienced.

What are some examples in Scripture that explain what the conditions were like?

Israel’s time in Egypt started out finding favor in their host nation. The sons of Israel all moved to Egypt during the famine in the area, being reunited with their brother Joseph. While Joseph was alive and second-in-command, Egypt thrived under his leadership. This is where the family of Israel settled and multiplied greatly (compare Genesis 47:27). What started well for this family turned out so bad after living there for several generations that God had to intervene to free them from their bondage.

The Egyptians, feeling threatened by their swelling population, enslaved the Israelites. “Now there arose a new king over Egypt, who did not know Joseph. And he said to his people, ‘Look, the people of the children of Israel are more and mightier than we; come, let us deal shrewdly with them, lest they multiply, and it happen, in the event of war, that they also join our enemies and fight against us, and so go up out of the land.’ Therefore they set taskmasters over them to afflict them with their burdens. And they built for Pharaoh supply cities, Pithom and Raamses. But the more they afflicted them, the more they multiplied and grew. And they were in dread of the children of Israel. So the Egyptians made the children of Israel serve with rigor. And they made their lives bitter with hard bondage—in mortar, in brick, and in all manner of service in the field. All their service in which they made them serve was with rigor” (Exodus 1:8-14).

In this passage we can see that the conditions in Egypt were utterly terrible for the Israelites. They experienced forced labor and were kept in subjection. The kind of forced work they had to do was hard, physical labor. When it says that “the Egyptians made the children of Israel serve with rigor “, the English word “rigor” does not even come close to conveying the full meaning of the word. The Hebrew word for “rigor” is “perek”, which Strong’s concordance defines as “to break apart; fracture, i.e. severity: — cruelty, rigour.” From this it is clear that the way Egypt forced Israel into labor goes beyond mere hard work, expanding to cruel servitude. Israel’s quality of life was awful, as shown by the example of how the Egyptians made their lives bitter. Israel suffered tremendously under these conditions and cried out because of it (compare Exodus 2:23).

Further explaining the arduous condition of slavery, the account in Exodus shows the cruelty Israel experienced after Moses pleaded with Pharaoh to let them worship God. “And the taskmasters of the people and their officers went out and spoke to the people, saying, ‘Thus says Pharaoh: “I will not give you straw. Go, get yourselves straw where you can find it; yet none of your work will be reduced.”’ So the people were scattered abroad throughout all the land of Egypt to gather stubble instead of straw. And the taskmasters forced them to hurry, saying, ‘Fulfill your work, your daily quota, as when there was straw.’ Also the officers of the children of Israel, whom Pharaoh’s taskmasters had set over them, were beaten and were asked, ‘Why have you not fulfilled your task in making brick both yesterday and today, as before?’” (Exodus 5:10-14). The hard work given to Israel to do was made even harder by neglecting them the resources they needed to complete it. Furthermore, the Egyptian taskmasters beat the Israelite servants when they struggled to complete the impossible task of making bricks without the necessary materials. The slavery they experienced was brutal.

With the view of history for us to learn from, we can see the terrible conditions that Israel experienced. Being an Israelite in Egypt meant living in fear of being beaten and forced into menial labor, being treated like animals. This history gives us the foundation from which we can understand the prophecies about returning to “Egyptian” slavery more fully. God inspired His prophets to warn His people about the consequences of disobedience, using the “Egyptian” slavery as the benchmark of comparison to illustrate the terrible conditions that will be experienced again.

It is difficult to comprehend the terrible conditions of slavery that ancient Israel experienced from the comforts of modern life in the 21^st century. To consider that these same awful conditions will again be experienced by the modern descendants of Israel and Judah is mind-boggling, almost to the point of disbelief. Yet, the prophecies referenced in the Bible that proclaim a return to “Egyptian” slavery make it clear there are dire consequences for disobedience that must take place again.

These are serious warnings, but they must be given. We hope that some of those who hear these warnings will repent, become converted and change their way of life so that they can be spared from the horrific events to come, including the prophesied “Egyptian slavery” for the modern Houses of Israel and Judah, and to stand before the Son of Man when He returns.

Lead Writer: Eric Rank

By Delia Messier (Canada)

My childhood friend and I had a long and very close relationship. Though we were no longer in the same faith and had agreed to disagree, we could still share and support one another.

My friend was a prominent person in her church. She was one of only two or three people who could read Scripture at Sunday Mass.  She taught catechism to new converts. She went to seminars with the nuns and had an ongoing rapport with their priest.

We encouraged and supported each other in difficult times.  Occasionally, my friend expressed that she lacked discernment and would be looking for understanding.   Knowing God’s Truth, I was often able to help her feel more confident.  One day, my friend told me that her church was open to people of other religions to use their church facilities; that we were living in an enlightened time.

Some time later, she announced that her daughter had become a Buddhist nun.  I asked her how she felt about her little Catholic daughter becoming a Buddhist nun, and she answered: “There is more than one way to God.”

She was a little taken aback when I replied to her: “There is only one way to eternal life, and that is through Jesus Christ.”

Her daughter, not long after, left the Buddhist faith, though she did not return to Catholicism.

A few years later, my dear friend died, and her daughter spoke at a very packed church funeral service with 200 to 300 in attendance.   At the podium, she said one thing that took me by surprise: “There is only one way to eternal life, that is through Jesus Christ.”

My friend and I had a special connection. On her deathbed, I was able to tell her that I would see her in the resurrection and encouraged her to be brave.  That day, I was the only person to whom she could respond. 

Looking back, I could see how God’s Spirit had been working quietly through our friendship all along.

Compiled by Norbert Link

“Sheer Madness… What on Earth Is Going On in Europe?” is the title of a new StandingWatch program, presented by Evangelist Norbert Link. Here is the summary:

What is Europe up to… and Germany and Britain in particular? What about Britain’s long-range missiles for Ukraine? What about Germany’s provocative war propaganda and insane rearmament spending; and what about their censorship and their appalling suppression of dissemination of news articles and opposing opinions?

A German AufPostenStehen program was posted with the same topic. The title is: “Der reine Wahnsinn … Was ist bloß in Europa los?“ 

Michael Link’s sermonette has been posted, titled, “When Nations Come Together”.

Here is a summary:

What major event brings nations from all over the world together, especially through the inspiring underdog story of a particular nation, showing how the world can briefly rally around courage, pride, and shared joy? This unity is short-lived, as conflict, division, and war will persist after the tournament ends. Only the return of Jesus Christ will bring true and permanent peace, when all nations will be unified under one divine rule with no more war, suffering, deception, or sorrow.

Norbert Link’s sermon has been posted. It is titled, “America and God’s Church – Astonishing Parallels.” 

Here is a summary:

What parallels and similarities might exist between America’s independence 250 years ago and the history of the founding of the Church of the Eternal God in the USA? Does God have a very specific timeline involving nations, individuals, and momentous events? Can this plan be altered? And what warnings does the Bible contain for God’s Church?

Andreas Raetz’s German sermonette from last Sabbath has been posted. It is titled, “Trägheit im Glauben—eine falsche Routine“ (“Sluggishness in Faith—a False Routine”).